FDFF vs. FTEC
FDFF (Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDFF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. FDFF is actively managed, while FTEC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDFF returned 11.88%/yr vs 29.49%/yr for FTEC. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDFF charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
FDFF vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDFF achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 22.53% return.
FDFF
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- -1.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.28%
FTEC
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 22.49%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 1Y
- 37.50%
- 3Y*
- 29.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 23.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $136.84K | $154.95K | $132.20K | |
| $86.23M | $78.73M | $94.95M |
FDFF vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | 2.08% | -2.75% | 27.86% | 16.58% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 22.53% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 15.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDFF and FTEC is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2023 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FDFF and FTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDFF vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDFF
FTEC
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FDFF
FTEC
Technology
FDFF
FTEC
Industrials
FDFF
FTEC
Real Estate
FDFF
FTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDFF
FTEC
Basic Materials
FDFF
-
FTEC
Communication Services
FDFF
-
FTEC
Consumer Defensive
FDFF
-
FTEC
-
Energy
FDFF
-
FTEC
Healthcare
FDFF
-
FTEC
-
Utilities
FDFF
-
FTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDFF vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
FDFF
FTEC
FDFF vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDFF | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.26 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 2.32 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | 6.23 | -6.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDFF vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDFF drawdown since its inception was -23.06%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFF and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDFF | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.06% | -34.95% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.60% | -16.26% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.06% | -27.30% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.30% | -8.48% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -5.59% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.26% | 6.04% | +4.22% |
Volatility
FDFF vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) is 4.86%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that FDFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDFF | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 8.41% | -3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.88% | 20.16% | -5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 24.30% | -5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 25.89% | -6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 24.99% | -6.04% |
FDFF vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDFF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDFF vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
FDFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than FTEC's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | 0.97% | 0.86% | 0.70% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDFF and FTEC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTEC has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to FDFF (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDFF dropped -23.06% vs FTEC's -34.95%.
On 3-year performance, FTEC leads with 29.49% vs 11.88% for FDFF. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDFF has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 29.49% return vs 11.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDFF.
FDFF has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.
FDFF is categorized as Financials Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDFF and 0.08% for FTEC.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDFF and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer