FDEV vs. OAIM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FDEV (Fidelity International Multifactor ETF) and OAIM (OneAscent International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FDEV is passively managed, while OAIM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDEV returned 14.89%/yr vs 18.50%/yr for OAIM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDEV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OAIM.

Performance

FDEV vs. OAIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and OneAscent International Equity ETF (OAIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEV achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly lower than OAIM's 14.62% return.

FDEV

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -2.26%
• YTD: 4.41%
• 6M: 7.53%
• 1Y: 13.97%
• 3Y*: 14.89%
• 5Y*: 7.33%
• 10Y*: —

OAIM

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 2.96%
• YTD: 14.62%
• 6M: 19.16%
• 1Y: 28.30%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEV vs. OAIM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF	4.41%	30.36%	5.84%	13.37%	6.40%
OAIM OneAscent International Equity ETF	14.62%	30.12%	8.18%	16.96%	7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEV and OAIM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2022	0.81

The correlation between FDEV and OAIM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDEV vs. OAIM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDEV	OAIM
Financial Services	21.9%	24.4%
Industrials	15.9%	21.0%
Healthcare	13.3%	1.1%
Energy	10.8%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.5%	1.6%
Utilities	8.1%	7.5%
Communication Services	7.2%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	6.3%
Basic Materials	4.1%	8.5%
Technology	3.7%	11.8%
Real Estate	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

FDEV vs. OAIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEV

FDEV Risk / Return Rank: 35
FDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 43

OAIM

OAIM Risk / Return Rank: 54
OAIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
OAIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
OAIM Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OAIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
OAIM Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEV vs. OAIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and OneAscent International Equity ETF (OAIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDEV	OAIM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.83	-0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	2.52	-0.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.34	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	2.80	-0.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.99	10.58	-3.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDEV vs. OAIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the OAIM Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEV and OAIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDEV	OAIM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.83	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.26	-0.73

Drawdowns

FDEV vs. OAIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEV drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than OAIM's maximum drawdown of -14.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEV and OAIM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDEV	OAIM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.11%	-14.69%	-15.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.46%	-10.88%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.47%	-14.69%	+4.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.30%	-0.40%	-3.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-2.81%	-3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	2.88%	-0.67%

Volatility

FDEV vs. OAIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) is 3.72%, while OneAscent International Equity ETF (OAIM) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that FDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OAIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDEV	OAIM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	5.67%	-1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.67%	13.29%	-3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.95%	15.58%	-3.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.90%	16.87%	-2.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.33%	16.87%	-1.54%

FDEV vs. OAIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than OAIM's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDEV vs. OAIM - Dividend Comparison

FDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than OAIM's 0.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF	2.81%	2.86%	2.99%	2.80%	2.65%	2.81%	1.88%	2.73%
OAIM OneAscent International Equity ETF	0.86%	0.98%	2.40%	1.94%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDEV and OAIM in my portfolio?

FDEV and OAIM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDEV or OAIM?

OAIM has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to FDEV (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEV dropped -30.11% vs OAIM's -14.69%.

Which ETF is better, FDEV or OAIM?

On 3-year performance, OAIM leads with 18.50% vs 14.89% for FDEV. On fees, FDEV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FDEV has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDEV or OAIM?

Over the 3-year period, OAIM has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 14.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDEV or OAIM?

FDEV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OAIM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDEV or OAIM?

FDEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.86% for OAIM.

What is the main difference between FDEV and OAIM?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Oneascent. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDEV and 0.95% for OAIM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OAIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.