FDETX vs. BOTZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ).
FDETX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 30, 1985. BOTZ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016.
Performance
FDETX vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDETX vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O | -1.95% | 27.60% | 27.07% | 24.20% | -8.00% | 25.32% | 9.12% | 31.39% | -9.09% | 16.45% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | -6.43% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDETX achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -6.43% return.
FDETX
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 27.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.97%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
BOTZ
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -11.23%
- YTD
- -6.43%
- 6M
- -4.66%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDETX vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDETX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDETX vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
FDETX
BOTZ
FDETX vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDETX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 0.69 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 1.19 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.15 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 1.03 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | 3.71 | +6.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDETX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 0.69 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.01 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.37 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDETX and BOTZ is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDETX vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
FDETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.55%, more than BOTZ's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O | 10.55% | 10.34% | 8.95% | 4.39% | 5.66% | 5.63% | 4.47% | 7.46% | 15.81% | 5.34% | 2.92% | 5.97% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.70% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FDETX vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDETX drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDETX and BOTZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDETX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -55.54% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -19.34% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | -55.54% | +33.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.71% | -14.52% | +7.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -18.56% | +7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 5.37% | -2.64% |
Volatility
FDETX vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) is 5.73%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that FDETX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDETX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 8.79% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 17.74% | -7.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 27.79% | -9.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 26.52% | -8.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 25.68% | -6.83% |