PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEQX vs. FCGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEQX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disciplined Equity Fund (FDEQX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEQX achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's 23.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FDEQX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 14.74%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.64% annualized return.


FDEQX

1D
-0.59%
1M
4.41%
YTD
13.81%
6M
13.21%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
24.02%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
14.74%

FCGSX

1D
-0.21%
1M
7.43%
YTD
23.66%
6M
24.81%
1Y
55.55%
3Y*
34.64%
5Y*
19.47%
10Y*
24.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEQX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDEQX
Fidelity Disciplined Equity Fund
13.81%16.43%25.01%34.07%-28.06%27.62%29.80%31.95%-10.37%20.15%
FCGSX
Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund
23.66%25.52%38.00%45.97%-32.15%25.13%70.01%39.75%-4.03%37.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEQX and FCGSX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013

0.91

The correlation between FDEQX and FCGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEQX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEQX
FDEQX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FDEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FCGSX
FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEQX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disciplined Equity Fund (FDEQX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDEQXFCGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.53

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

5.43

-3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

24.79

-14.51

FDEQX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEQX and FCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDEQXFCGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

3.21

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.83

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

1.06

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.98

-0.37

Drawdowns

FDEQX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEQX drawdown since its inception was -55.27%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEQX and FCGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEQXFCGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.27%

-38.77%

-16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-10.42%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.31%

-26.07%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.91%

-38.77%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.91%

-38.77%

+5.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.21%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.89%

-6.96%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.28%

+0.61%

Volatility

FDEQX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disciplined Equity Fund (FDEQX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEQXFCGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.43%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

13.34%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

17.65%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.01%

23.65%

-3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.01%

23.24%

-3.23%

FDEQX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEQX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEQX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

FDEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, less than FCGSX's 8.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCGSX
Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund
8.47%10.48%12.49%3.13%0.61%38.65%31.99%11.06%13.21%10.51%2.44%0.25%
FDEQX
Fidelity Disciplined Equity Fund
7.08%8.06%9.23%4.55%2.89%1.43%0.02%0.54%15.29%2.89%1.46%5.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FDEQX and FCGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCGSX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to FDEQX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEQX dropped -55.27% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.

FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEQX and FCGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer