FDEM vs. XCEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) and XCEM (Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - FDEM tracks the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index while XCEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDEM returned 9.43%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for XCEM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDEM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for XCEM.

Performance

FDEM vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 22.58% return, which is significantly lower than XCEM's 38.32% return.

FDEM

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 7.69%
• YTD: 22.58%
• 6M: 24.26%
• 1Y: 45.52%
• 3Y*: 23.79%
• 5Y*: 9.43%
• 10Y*: —

XCEM

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 12.13%
• YTD: 38.32%
• 6M: 44.13%
• 1Y: 71.14%
• 3Y*: 26.37%
• 5Y*: 11.95%
• 10Y*: 12.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEM vs. XCEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	22.58%	26.75%	9.34%	17.26%	-13.11%	-3.52%	8.87%	5.73%
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF	38.32%	34.05%	0.42%	19.96%	-17.59%	7.87%	9.47%	12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEM and XCEM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019	0.83

The correlation between FDEM and XCEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDEM vs. XCEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDEM	XCEM
Technology	31.8%	1.1%
Financial Services	16.3%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	1.1%
Communication Services	10.6%	4.2%
Energy	8.3%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	0.3%
Real Estate	5.2%	0.0%
Industrials	4.8%	0.4%
Basic Materials	3.2%	0.7%
Healthcare	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

FDEM vs. XCEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEM

FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 76
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

XCEM

XCEM Risk / Return Rank: 90
XCEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XCEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
XCEM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XCEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XCEM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEM vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDEM	XCEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	3.42	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	4.27	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.61	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	4.95	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.12	19.98	-5.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDEM vs. XCEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the XCEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEM and XCEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDEM	XCEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	3.42	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.68	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.63	-0.10

Drawdowns

FDEM vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum XCEM drawdown of -41.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and XCEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDEM	XCEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.65%	-41.24%	+7.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.70%	-14.46%	+1.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.04%	-18.92%	+2.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.02%	-29.67%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-1.25%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-8.59%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	3.57%	-0.34%

Volatility

FDEM vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) is 7.26%, while Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that FDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDEM	XCEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	9.43%	-2.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	18.72%	-3.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.36%	20.89%	-3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.13%	17.75%	-1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.91%	19.72%	-1.81%

FDEM vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDEM vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison

FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than XCEM's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	2.66%	3.23%	4.05%	4.41%	3.95%	2.71%	1.84%	2.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF	2.35%	3.25%	2.76%	1.22%	2.42%	1.94%	1.63%	2.11%	2.70%	9.56%	1.24%	2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDEM and XCEM in my portfolio?

FDEM and XCEM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDEM or XCEM?

XCEM has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to FDEM (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs XCEM's -41.24%.

Which ETF is better, FDEM or XCEM?

On 5-year performance, XCEM leads with 11.95% vs 9.43% for FDEM. On fees, XCEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, FDEM has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDEM or XCEM?

Over the 5-year period, XCEM has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDEM or XCEM?

XCEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDEM or XCEM?

FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.35% for XCEM.

What is the main difference between FDEM and XCEM?

FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while XCEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.16% for XCEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XCEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.