FDEM vs. EMXC
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC).
FDEM and EMXC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDEM is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2019. EMXC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Jul 19, 2017. Both FDEM and EMXC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FDEM vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDEM vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 2.77% | 26.75% | 9.34% | 17.26% | -13.11% | -3.52% | 8.87% | 5.73% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 8.23% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 8.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 8.23% return.
FDEM
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -8.84%
- YTD
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 27.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC
- 1D
- 4.13%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDEM vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDEM vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
FDEM
EMXC
FDEM vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 2.31 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 2.98 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 3.26 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.58 | 13.81 | -5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 2.31 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.49 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDEM and EMXC is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDEM vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than EMXC's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.05% | 4.41% | 3.95% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.60% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
FDEM vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and EMXC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.65% | -42.81% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -14.41% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | -28.91% | -0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -10.88% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -10.35% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 3.40% | -0.18% |
Volatility
FDEM vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) is 9.54%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 11.89%. This indicates that FDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.54% | 11.89% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 16.14% | -2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.15% | 20.58% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 16.70% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 19.51% | -1.75% |