FDEM vs. EMXC
FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - FDEM tracks the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index while EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDEM returned 9.43%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for EMXC. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDEM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
FDEM vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 22.58% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 41.72% return.
FDEM
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 22.58%
- 6M
- 24.26%
- 1Y
- 45.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 12.61%
- YTD
- 41.72%
- 6M
- 46.94%
- 1Y
- 77.94%
- 3Y*
- 29.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- —
FDEM vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 22.58% | 26.75% | 9.34% | 17.26% | -13.11% | -3.52% | 8.87% | 5.73% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 41.72% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDEM and EMXC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FDEM and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDEM vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDEM
EMXC
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FDEM
EMXC
Financial Services
FDEM
EMXC
Consumer Cyclical
FDEM
EMXC
Communication Services
FDEM
EMXC
Energy
FDEM
EMXC
Consumer Defensive
FDEM
EMXC
Real Estate
FDEM
EMXC
Industrials
FDEM
EMXC
Basic Materials
FDEM
EMXC
Healthcare
FDEM
-
EMXC
Utilities
FDEM
-
EMXC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDEM vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
FDEM
EMXC
FDEM vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.64 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 5.44 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.12 | 21.99 | -7.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 3.61 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.74 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.55 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
FDEM vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.65% | -42.81% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -14.41% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.04% | -19.12% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.02% | -28.91% | -0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.00% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -10.19% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.56% | -0.33% |
Volatility
FDEM vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) is 7.26%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that FDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 9.88% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.03% | 19.34% | -4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 21.70% | -4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 17.45% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 19.82% | -1.91% |
FDEM vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDEM vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than EMXC's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 1.99% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 2.66% | 3.23% | 4.05% | 4.41% | 3.95% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDEM and EMXC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to FDEM (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.76% vs 9.43% for FDEM. On fees, FDEM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDEM has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDEM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.
FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.99% for EMXC.
FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDEM and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer