FDEM vs. AVEM
FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) and AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while AVEM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDEM returned 9.43%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for AVEM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDEM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AVEM.
Performance
FDEM vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 22.58% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 27.59% return.
FDEM
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 22.58%
- 6M
- 24.26%
- 1Y
- 45.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
AVEM
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 27.59%
- 6M
- 29.75%
- 1Y
- 55.00%
- 3Y*
- 26.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
FDEM vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 22.58% | 26.75% | 9.34% | 17.26% | -13.11% | -3.52% | 8.87% | 7.14% |
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 27.59% | 34.48% | 7.49% | 15.30% | -18.15% | 5.16% | 14.39% | 11.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDEM and AVEM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FDEM and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDEM vs. AVEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDEM
AVEM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FDEM
AVEM
Financial Services
FDEM
AVEM
Consumer Cyclical
FDEM
AVEM
Communication Services
FDEM
AVEM
Energy
FDEM
AVEM
Consumer Defensive
FDEM
AVEM
Real Estate
FDEM
AVEM
Industrials
FDEM
AVEM
Basic Materials
FDEM
AVEM
Healthcare
FDEM
-
AVEM
Utilities
FDEM
-
AVEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDEM vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank
FDEM
AVEM
FDEM vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDEM | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.51 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 4.21 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.12 | 16.70 | -2.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDEM | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.84 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.54 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.66 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
FDEM vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum AVEM drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and AVEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDEM | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.65% | -36.05% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -13.13% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.04% | -18.02% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.02% | -34.00% | +4.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.39% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -10.09% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.30% | -0.07% |
Volatility
FDEM vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) is 7.26%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that FDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDEM | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 8.33% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.03% | 16.72% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 19.45% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 18.34% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 20.55% | -2.64% |
FDEM vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDEM vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison
FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than AVEM's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.98% | 2.45% | 3.17% | 3.06% | 2.77% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 0.35% |
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 2.66% | 3.23% | 4.05% | 4.41% | 3.95% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FDEM and AVEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVEM has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to FDEM (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs AVEM's -36.05%.
On 5-year performance, AVEM leads with 9.92% vs 9.43% for FDEM. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, FDEM has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.
FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.98% for AVEM.
FDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AVEM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while AVEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.33% for AVEM.
AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDEM and AVEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer