PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEGX vs. IWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEGX vs. IWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEGX achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's 1.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDEGX having a 11.86% annualized return and IWP not far ahead at 12.22%.


FDEGX

1D
-3.58%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
8.51%
6M
-1.97%
1Y
1.60%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
11.86%

IWP

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.28%
YTD
1.66%
6M
0.18%
1Y
2.82%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
12.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEGX vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
8.51%2.88%26.57%20.93%-26.50%21.30%29.34%36.59%-6.92%21.03%
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
1.66%8.45%21.86%25.70%-26.90%12.60%35.25%35.04%-4.89%24.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEGX and IWP is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2001

0.95

The correlation between FDEGX and IWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEGX vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEGX
FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

IWP
IWP Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWP Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEGX vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDEGXIWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.04

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

0.19

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

0.56

-0.18

FDEGX vs. IWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is comparable to the IWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEGX and IWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDEGXIWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

0.17

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.27

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.42

-0.03

Drawdowns

FDEGX vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEGX drawdown since its inception was -85.96%, which is greater than IWP's maximum drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEGX and IWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEGXIWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.96%

-56.92%

-29.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.45%

-14.79%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.04%

-25.20%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.62%

-38.62%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.62%

-38.62%

+2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.93%

-4.08%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.82%

-9.68%

-27.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.01%

5.08%

+2.93%

Volatility

FDEGX vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) at 4.62%. This indicates that FDEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEGXIWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

4.62%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.21%

12.93%

+6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.26%

16.71%

+5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.35%

22.34%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.07%

21.70%

+0.37%

FDEGX vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEGX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEGX vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison

FDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%7.89%0.05%0.00%14.15%8.37%3.65%0.75%0.05%0.59%0.13%
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.37%0.40%0.54%0.77%0.30%0.38%0.59%1.02%0.78%1.16%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FDEGX and IWP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDEGX has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to IWP (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEGX dropped -85.96% vs IWP's -56.92%.

IWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEGX and IWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer