FDEC vs. FDND
FDEC (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December) and FDND (FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDEC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while FDND is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FDEC returned 20.01% vs 7.37% for FDND. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FDND.
Performance
FDEC vs. FDND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDEC achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's 2.42% return.
FDEC
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 20.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- —
FDND
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 7.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDEC vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FDEC FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December | 6.38% | 14.82% | 8.40% |
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF | 2.42% | 9.69% | 15.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDEC and FDND is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between FDEC and FDND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDEC vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank
FDEC
FDND
FDEC vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDEC | FDND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.08 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 0.36 | +3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.84 | 0.88 | +16.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDEC | FDND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 0.40 | +2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.60 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
FDEC vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDEC drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEC and FDND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDEC | FDND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.67% | -24.12% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | -20.49% | +14.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -4.24% | +4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -5.67% | +3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 8.39% | -7.27% |
Volatility
FDEC vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) is 1.27%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that FDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDEC | FDND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 5.29% | -4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.92% | 14.07% | -8.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.62% | 18.28% | -10.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.21% | 21.40% | -10.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.01% | 21.40% | -10.39% |
FDEC vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDEC vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison
FDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FDEC FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF | 7.98% | 8.11% | 5.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDEC and FDND have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDND has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to FDEC (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEC dropped -15.67% vs FDND's -24.12%.
On 1-year performance, FDEC leads with 20.01% vs 7.37% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FDEC has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FDEC has performed better with a 20.01% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FDEC.
FDND has the higher dividend yield at 7.98%, compared with 0.00% for FDEC.
FDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FDND is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FDEC and 0.75% for FDND.
FDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDEC and FDND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer