PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEC vs. FDND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEC vs. FDND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEC achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's 2.42% return.


FDEC

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.64%
YTD
6.38%
6M
7.86%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*

FDND

1D
-1.99%
1M
3.57%
YTD
2.42%
6M
1.71%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEC vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FDEC
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December
6.38%14.82%8.40%
FDND
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF
2.42%9.69%15.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEC and FDND is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024

0.68

The correlation between FDEC and FDND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEC vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEC
FDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FDND
FDND Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEC vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDECFDNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.08

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

0.36

+3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.84

0.88

+16.96

FDEC vs. FDND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the FDND Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEC and FDND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDECFDNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

0.40

+2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.60

+0.44

Drawdowns

FDEC vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEC drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEC and FDND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDECFDNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-24.12%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.83%

-20.49%

+14.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-4.24%

+4.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-5.67%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

8.39%

-7.27%

Volatility

FDEC vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) is 1.27%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that FDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDECFDNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

5.29%

-4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.92%

14.07%

-8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.62%

18.28%

-10.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.21%

21.40%

-10.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.01%

21.40%

-10.39%

FDEC vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEC vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison

FDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FDEC and FDND have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDND has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to FDEC (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEC dropped -15.67% vs FDND's -24.12%.

On 1-year performance, FDEC leads with 20.01% vs 7.37% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FDEC has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDEC has performed better with a 20.01% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FDEC.

FDND has the higher dividend yield at 7.98%, compared with 0.00% for FDEC.

FDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FDND is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FDEC and 0.75% for FDND.

FDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEC and FDND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer