FDD vs. FGM
FDD (First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund) and FGM (First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund) are both Europe Equities funds from First Trust - FDD tracks the STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 while FGM tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDD returned 10.93%/yr vs 8.76%/yr for FGM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDD charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FGM.
Performance
FDD vs. FGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDD achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly higher than FGM's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FDD has outperformed FGM with an annualized return of 10.93%, while FGM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.76% annualized return.
FDD
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 6M
- 17.76%
- 1Y
- 33.45%
- 3Y*
- 26.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
FGM
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 17.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
FDD vs. FGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 13.65% | 62.50% | 0.28% | 14.16% | -16.14% | 16.03% | -3.80% | 23.79% | -8.98% | 19.07% |
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 3.19% | 63.60% | 1.36% | 13.28% | -30.46% | 6.10% | 17.26% | 20.77% | -25.14% | 44.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDD and FGM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2012 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FDD and FGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDD vs. FGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDD
FGM
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
-
Financial Services
FDD
FGM
Industrials
FDD
FGM
Consumer Cyclical
FDD
FGM
Energy
FDD
FGM
-
Utilities
FDD
FGM
Consumer Defensive
FDD
FGM
Real Estate
FDD
FGM
Basic Materials
FDD
FGM
Communication Services
FDD
FGM
Healthcare
FDD
-
FGM
Technology
FDD
-
FGM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDD vs. FGM — Risk / Return Rank
FDD
FGM
FDD vs. FGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDD | FGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.16 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 0.98 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 3.01 | +8.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDD vs. FGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDD drawdown since its inception was -74.77%, which is greater than FGM's maximum drawdown of -51.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDD and FGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDD | FGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.77% | -51.58% | -23.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -17.76% | +8.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.06% | -17.93% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.11% | -50.45% | +15.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.43% | -51.58% | +10.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -8.26% | +7.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.41% | -14.72% | -20.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 5.81% | -2.98% |
Volatility
FDD vs. FGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) is 5.91%, while First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that FDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDD | FGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 6.75% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 17.55% | -4.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.93% | 20.94% | -5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 24.54% | -6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 23.11% | -2.95% |
FDD vs. FGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDD has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FGM's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDD vs. FGM - Dividend Comparison
FDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than FGM's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 3.48% | 3.99% | 7.65% | 6.85% | 6.07% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 4.69% | 5.05% | 2.78% | 4.88% | 4.35% |
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 0.64% | 0.66% | 2.56% | 2.82% | 5.44% | 1.43% | 1.33% | 2.30% | 2.18% | 2.11% | 1.33% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDD and FGM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGM has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to FDD (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDD dropped -74.77% vs FGM's -51.58%.
On 10-year performance, FDD leads with 10.93% vs 8.76% for FGM. On fees, FDD is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FDD has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDD has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDD is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.
FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 0.64% for FGM.
FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30, while FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FDD and 0.80% for FGM.
FDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDD and FGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer