FDD vs. EWG
FDD (First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund) and EWG (iShares MSCI Germany ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FDD tracks the STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 while EWG tracks the MSCI Germany Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDD returned 10.93%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for EWG. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDD charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWG.
Performance
FDD vs. EWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDD achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly higher than EWG's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FDD has outperformed EWG with an annualized return of 10.93%, while EWG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.18% annualized return.
FDD
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 6M
- 17.76%
- 1Y
- 33.45%
- 3Y*
- 26.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
EWG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 1.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
FDD vs. EWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 13.65% | 62.50% | 0.28% | 14.16% | -16.14% | 16.03% | -3.80% | 23.79% | -8.98% | 19.07% |
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | -0.45% | 35.79% | 9.79% | 23.35% | -22.27% | 5.84% | 10.09% | 19.15% | -21.40% | 27.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDD and EWG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FDD and EWG shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDD vs. EWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDD
EWG
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
FDD
EWG
Industrials
FDD
EWG
Consumer Cyclical
FDD
EWG
Energy
FDD
EWG
-
Utilities
FDD
EWG
Consumer Defensive
FDD
EWG
Real Estate
FDD
EWG
Basic Materials
FDD
EWG
Communication Services
FDD
EWG
Healthcare
FDD
-
EWG
Technology
FDD
-
EWG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDD vs. EWG — Risk / Return Rank
FDD
EWG
FDD vs. EWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDD | EWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.03 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 0.13 | +3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 0.38 | +11.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDD vs. EWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDD drawdown since its inception was -74.77%, which is greater than EWG's maximum drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDD and EWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDD | EWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.77% | -67.57% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -14.54% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.06% | -15.81% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.11% | -43.23% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.43% | -46.80% | +5.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -5.05% | +4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.41% | -19.18% | -16.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 4.97% | -2.14% |
Volatility
FDD vs. EWG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) have volatilities of 5.91% and 6.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDD | EWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 6.22% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 14.61% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.93% | 17.66% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 20.54% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 21.10% | -0.94% |
FDD vs. EWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDD has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than EWG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDD vs. EWG - Dividend Comparison
FDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than EWG's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | 1.61% | 1.60% | 2.38% | 2.56% | 3.24% | 2.70% | 1.67% | 2.51% | 2.93% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.93% |
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 3.48% | 3.99% | 7.65% | 6.85% | 6.07% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 4.69% | 5.05% | 2.78% | 4.88% | 4.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDD and EWG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWG has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to FDD (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDD dropped -74.77% vs EWG's -67.57%.
On 10-year performance, FDD leads with 10.93% vs 8.18% for EWG. On fees, EWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FDD has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDD has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.
FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 1.61% for EWG.
FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30, while EWG tracks MSCI Germany Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FDD and 0.49% for EWG.
FDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDD and EWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer