FDCPX vs. PGTAX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FDCPX (Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio) and PGTAX (Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A) are both Technology Equities funds. FDCPX is actively managed, while PGTAX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDCPX returned 27.58%/yr vs 24.59%/yr for PGTAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDCPX charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PGTAX.

Performance

FDCPX vs. PGTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDCPX achieves a 78.03% return, which is significantly higher than PGTAX's 33.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FDCPX has outperformed PGTAX with an annualized return of 27.58%, while PGTAX has yielded a comparatively lower 24.59% annualized return.

FDCPX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.88%
• 6M: 70.85%
• YTD: 78.03%
• 1Y: 122.89%
• 3Y*: 54.03%
• 5Y*: 28.58%
• 10Y*: 27.58%

PGTAX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 29.54%
• YTD: 33.20%
• 1Y: 49.33%
• 3Y*: 32.32%
• 5Y*: 16.59%
• 10Y*: 24.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDCPX vs. PGTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio	78.03%	54.44%	22.40%	33.52%	-28.63%	23.68%	46.07%	40.15%	-6.30%	32.64%
PGTAX Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A	33.20%	23.03%	27.57%	53.42%	-32.46%	11.44%	70.50%	47.20%	-6.96%	46.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FDCPX and PGTAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2008	0.86

The correlation between FDCPX and PGTAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDCPX vs. PGTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCPX

FDCPX Risk / Return Rank: 97
FDCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FDCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FDCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FDCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FDCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PGTAX

PGTAX Risk / Return Rank: 71
PGTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PGTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
PGTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PGTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PGTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCPX vs. PGTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDCPX	PGTAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.19	1.94	+2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.27	2.45	+1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.33	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.76	3.58	+6.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	36.30	9.87	+26.43

FDCPX vs. PGTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDCPX Sharpe Ratio is 4.19, which is higher than the PGTAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCPX and PGTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDCPX vs. PGTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCPX drawdown since its inception was -81.96%, which is greater than PGTAX's maximum drawdown of -42.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCPX and PGTAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDCPX	PGTAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.96%	-42.21%	-39.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.61%	-13.67%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.59%	-28.42%	+4.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.29%	-42.21%	+6.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.29%	-42.21%	+6.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.98%	-7.58%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.07%	-6.68%	-19.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	4.95%	-1.56%

Volatility

FDCPX vs. PGTAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) has a higher volatility of 16.11% compared to Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) at 10.83%. This indicates that FDCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDCPX	PGTAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.11%	10.83%	+5.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.28%	21.67%	+4.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.42%	25.27%	+4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.80%	25.59%	-1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.49%	24.37%	-1.88%

FDCPX vs. PGTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCPX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than PGTAX's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDCPX vs. PGTAX - Dividend Comparison

FDCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, less than PGTAX's 8.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio	6.01%	14.38%	7.58%	0.51%	17.72%	16.95%	8.81%	12.15%	23.69%	10.50%	6.57%	4.53%
PGTAX Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A	8.60%	11.45%	6.71%	0.38%	1.52%	22.04%	14.04%	2.49%	9.37%	6.91%	0.83%	4.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDCPX and PGTAX in my portfolio?

FDCPX and PGTAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDCPX or PGTAX?

FDCPX has higher volatility (16.11%) compared to PGTAX (10.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDCPX dropped -81.96% vs PGTAX's -42.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.19 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.