PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDCFX vs. FOTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDCFX vs. FOTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class C (FDCFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDCFX achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly higher than FOTKX's 5.43% return.


FDCFX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6.15%
6M
6.66%
1Y
14.93%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*
6.41%

FOTKX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.88%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.81%
1Y
12.95%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDCFX vs. FOTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDCFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class C
6.15%13.47%6.05%11.14%-16.84%7.64%12.30%17.51%-5.79%6.21%
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
5.43%11.66%5.55%9.97%-13.05%5.68%11.29%14.46%-3.65%5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FDCFX and FOTKX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FDCFX and FOTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDCFX vs. FOTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCFX
FDCFX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FDCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FOTKX
FOTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FOTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FOTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCFX vs. FOTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class C (FDCFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDCFXFOTKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

2.67

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.07

3.90

-0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.55

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

3.26

-0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.43

14.38

-2.95

FDCFX vs. FOTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDCFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the FOTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCFX and FOTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDCFXFOTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.67

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.61

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.87

-0.45

Drawdowns

FDCFX vs. FOTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCFX drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, which is greater than FOTKX's maximum drawdown of -18.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCFX and FOTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDCFXFOTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.97%

-18.29%

-29.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-4.03%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-5.71%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.25%

-18.29%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-3.56%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

0.91%

+0.41%

Volatility

FDCFX vs. FOTKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class C (FDCFX) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) at 1.94%. This indicates that FDCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDCFXFOTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

1.94%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

4.14%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.04%

4.92%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.88%

6.38%

+2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.05%

6.42%

+2.63%

FDCFX vs. FOTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCFX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FOTKX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDCFX vs. FOTKX - Dividend Comparison

FDCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than FOTKX's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDCFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class C
7.09%7.04%3.91%1.54%8.31%10.14%6.37%6.02%8.67%5.15%3.63%3.32%
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
4.91%5.25%3.32%2.98%7.41%9.53%6.17%6.00%7.24%3.57%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FDCFX and FOTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDCFX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to FOTKX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDCFX dropped -47.97% vs FOTKX's -18.29%.

FOTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDCFX and FOTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer