FDAAX vs. PLFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX).
FDAAX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 30, 2001. PLFRX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Jun 29, 2011.
Performance
FDAAX vs. PLFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDAAX vs. PLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDAAX Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund | -1.34% | 4.68% | 8.52% | 14.35% | -1.37% | 8.55% | -3.71% | 3.30% | 0.95% | 2.44% |
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | -1.34% | 6.68% | 8.38% | 13.94% | -2.01% | 4.36% | 1.26% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 4.33% |
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with FDAAX at -1.34% and PLFRX at -1.34%. Over the past 10 years, FDAAX has underperformed PLFRX with an annualized return of 4.50%, while PLFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.04% annualized return.
FDAAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 4.50%
PLFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDAAX vs. PLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDAAX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than PLFRX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDAAX vs. PLFRX — Risk / Return Rank
FDAAX
PLFRX
FDAAX vs. PLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDAAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.96 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 3.42 | -1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.61 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.90 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 9.49 | -4.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDAAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.96 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.85 | 2.05 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 1.43 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDAAX and PLFRX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FDAAX vs. PLFRX - Dividend Comparison
FDAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than PLFRX's 6.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDAAX Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund | 7.41% | 8.00% | 9.42% | 7.64% | 5.84% | 3.73% | 5.07% | 5.62% | 5.18% | 3.79% | 4.57% | 4.71% |
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | 6.59% | 7.18% | 8.47% | 8.92% | 4.39% | 3.65% | 3.68% | 5.10% | 5.03% | 4.46% | 4.21% | 4.52% |
Drawdowns
FDAAX vs. PLFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDAAX drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, which is greater than PLFRX's maximum drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAAX and PLFRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDAAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -18.75% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.26% | -1.82% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.22% | -6.44% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.08% | -18.75% | +0.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -1.55% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -0.73% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 0.56% | +0.11% |
Volatility
FDAAX vs. PLFRX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) at 0.76%. This indicates that FDAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDAAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 0.76% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.35% | 1.79% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 2.76% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 2.74% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.83% | 3.75% | +0.08% |