PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCXG vs. RTXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCXG vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCXG

1D
-2.59%
1M
41.30%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RTXG

1D
7.53%
1M
7.34%
YTD
-10.32%
6M
2.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCXG vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCXG and RTXG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCXG vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FCXG vs. RTXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCXGRTXGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.92

-0.56

Drawdowns

FCXG vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCXG drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than RTXG's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCXG and RTXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCXGRTXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-37.49%

-7.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-31.45%

+22.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.12%

-8.76%

-12.36%

Volatility

FCXG vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCXGRTXGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.09%

49.13%

+59.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.09%

49.13%

+59.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.09%

49.13%

+59.96%

FCXG vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCXG and RTXG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

FCXG vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison

FCXG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FCXG and RTXG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCXG and RTXG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 0.00% for FCXG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCXG and RTXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer