FCXG vs. MULL
FCXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FCXG is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCXG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
FCXG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCXG
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 55.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCXG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCXG Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF | 12.94% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 434.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCXG and MULL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCXG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
FCXG
MULL
FCXG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCXG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 46.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 7.45 | -6.96 |
Drawdowns
FCXG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCXG drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCXG and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCXG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -72.29% | +27.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.40% | 0.00% | -6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.29% | -20.62% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.79% | — |
Volatility
FCXG vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCXG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 105.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.72% | 132.38% | -22.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.72% | 136.22% | -26.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.72% | 136.22% | -26.50% |
FCXG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCXG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
FCXG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FCXG Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCXG and MULL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for FCXG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FCXG and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for FCXG and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer