FCXG vs. INFH
FCXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF) and INFH (Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FCXG is passively managed, while INFH is actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FCXG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for INFH.
Performance
FCXG vs. INFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCXG
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
INFH
- 1D
- -4.07%
- 1M
- -43.01%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $223.64K | $203.00K | $533.52K | |
| $1.74M | $2.21M | $2.81M |
FCXG vs. INFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCXG Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF | -24.53% |
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF | -71.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCXG and INFH is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCXG vs. INFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCXG vs. INFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCXG drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum INFH drawdown of -75.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCXG and INFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCXG | INFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -75.15% | +30.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.19% | -71.52% | +40.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.43% | -50.28% | +26.85% |
Volatility
FCXG vs. INFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCXG | INFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.68% | 197.81% | -90.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.68% | 197.81% | -90.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.68% | 197.81% | -90.13% |
FCXG vs. INFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than INFH's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCXG vs. INFH - Dividend Comparison
Neither FCXG nor INFH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FCXG and INFH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.
FCXG and INFH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FCXG and 1.31% for INFH.
Find the right allocation for FCXG and INFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer