PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCXG vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCXG vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCXG

1D
-2.84%
1M
3.11%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

AMDG

1D
-3.81%
1M
-20.14%
6M
179.34%
YTD
230.68%
1Y
319.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
243.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.00M$7.90M$8.98M
$223.64K$203.00K$533.52K

FCXG vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCXG and AMDG is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCXG vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCXG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCXG vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCXGAMDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.98

FCXG vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCXG vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCXG drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum AMDG drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCXG and AMDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCXGAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-63.32%

+18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.19%

-37.43%

+6.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.43%

-25.05%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.98%

Volatility

FCXG vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCXGAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

49.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

113.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.68%

142.79%

-35.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.68%

135.20%

-27.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.68%

135.20%

-27.52%

FCXG vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCXG and AMDG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

FCXG vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

FCXG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FCXG and AMDG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCXG and AMDG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.00% for FCXG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCXG and AMDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer