FCVTX vs. GTTTX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FCVTX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M) and GTTTX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCVTX returned 11.27%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for GTTTX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FCVTX charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GTTTX.

Performance

FCVTX vs. GTTTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCVTX having a 22.94% return and GTTTX slightly lower at 21.95%. Over the past 10 years, FCVTX has underperformed GTTTX with an annualized return of 11.27%, while GTTTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.

FCVTX

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 4.88%
• YTD: 22.94%
• 6M: 20.19%
• 1Y: 35.68%
• 3Y*: 18.01%
• 5Y*: 8.82%
• 10Y*: 11.27%

GTTTX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 21.95%
• 6M: 19.36%
• 1Y: 44.12%
• 3Y*: 32.42%
• 5Y*: 15.58%
• 10Y*: 15.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVTX vs. GTTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCVTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M	22.94%	7.53%	7.42%	17.19%	-13.53%	37.49%	10.60%	20.19%	-15.58%	11.68%
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	21.95%	12.83%	45.27%	17.37%	-13.66%	32.94%	0.21%	23.37%	-10.83%	7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVTX and GTTTX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008	0.96

The correlation between FCVTX and GTTTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCVTX vs. GTTTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVTX

FCVTX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FCVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FCVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FCVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FCVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FCVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

GTTTX

GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 87
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVTX vs. GTTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCVTX	GTTTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.49	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	3.46	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.42	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	5.06	-1.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.60	17.80	-5.21

FCVTX vs. GTTTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the GTTTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVTX and GTTTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCVTX vs. GTTTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVTX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, roughly equal to the maximum GTTTX drawdown of -56.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVTX and GTTTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCVTX	GTTTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.26%	-56.58%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-9.16%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.91%	-39.29%	+14.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.91%	-39.29%	+14.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.83%	-47.29%	+2.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.36%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.21%	-9.91%	+1.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	2.59%	+0.39%

Volatility

FCVTX vs. GTTTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) at 5.40%. This indicates that FCVTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTTTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCVTX	GTTTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.82%	5.40%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.41%	12.69%	+0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.19%	18.66%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.96%	35.35%	-14.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.36%	30.81%	-8.45%

FCVTX vs. GTTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVTX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GTTTX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVTX vs. GTTTX - Dividend Comparison

FCVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, more than GTTTX's 6.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCVTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M	8.70%	10.69%	4.91%	5.34%	6.37%	8.00%	0.23%	3.20%	38.15%	3.30%	6.98%	11.13%
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	6.88%	8.39%	52.07%	1.87%	3.85%	40.18%	0.90%	0.90%	12.37%	11.87%	4.51%	7.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCVTX and GTTTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FCVTX and GTTTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCVTX or GTTTX?

FCVTX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to GTTTX (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVTX dropped -58.26% vs GTTTX's -56.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.