FCVTX vs. BSCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX).
FCVTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. BSCMX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 2, 2018.
Performance
FCVTX vs. BSCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCVTX vs. BSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCVTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M | 1.76% | 7.53% | 7.42% | 17.19% | -13.53% | 37.49% | 10.60% | 20.19% | -17.15% |
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 8.18% | 23.51% | 24.77% | 22.75% | -7.89% | 27.61% | 20.38% | 12.82% | -12.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCVTX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than BSCMX's 8.18% return.
FCVTX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -6.75%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- 15.93%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
BSCMX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 42.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.29%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCVTX vs. BSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCVTX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCMX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCVTX vs. BSCMX — Risk / Return Rank
FCVTX
BSCMX
FCVTX vs. BSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCVTX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 1.96 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 2.74 | -1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.36 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.06 | -1.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 12.65 | -8.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCVTX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.96 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.86 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.66 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCVTX and BSCMX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCVTX vs. BSCMX - Dividend Comparison
FCVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.51%, more than BSCMX's 4.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCVTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M | 10.51% | 10.69% | 4.91% | 5.34% | 6.37% | 8.00% | 0.23% | 3.20% | 38.15% | 3.30% | 6.98% | 11.13% |
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 4.20% | 4.54% | 2.31% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 9.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCVTX vs. BSCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCVTX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, which is greater than BSCMX's maximum drawdown of -38.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVTX and BSCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCVTX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.26% | -38.12% | -20.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.42% | -13.85% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.91% | -22.34% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.91% | -7.43% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -6.10% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 3.35% | +0.56% |
Volatility
FCVTX vs. BSCMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) at 5.72%. This indicates that FCVTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCVTX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 5.72% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 12.37% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.93% | 22.03% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 17.85% | +2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 20.69% | +1.59% |