FCVTX vs. PVCMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCVTX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M) and PVCMX (Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FCVTX returned 7.41%/yr vs 4.28%/yr for PVCMX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCVTX charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for PVCMX.

Performance

FCVTX vs. PVCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVTX achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than PVCMX's 2.30% return.

FCVTX

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 18.92%
• 6M: 16.45%
• 1Y: 34.04%
• 3Y*: 16.20%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: 10.44%

PVCMX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: 3.13%
• 1Y: 5.64%
• 3Y*: 5.42%
• 5Y*: 4.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVTX vs. PVCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCVTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M	18.92%	7.53%	7.42%	17.19%	-13.53%	37.49%	10.60%	8.99%
PVCMX Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class	2.30%	4.45%	4.24%	9.47%	3.17%	3.72%	19.13%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVTX and PVCMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019	0.68

The correlation between FCVTX and PVCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCVTX vs. PVCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVTX

FCVTX Risk / Return Rank: 57
FCVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
FCVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FCVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FCVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FCVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

PVCMX

PVCMX Risk / Return Rank: 27
PVCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PVCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
PVCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PVCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
PVCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVTX vs. PVCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCVTX	PVCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	1.43	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	2.23	+0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.26	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	2.14	+1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.33	6.20	+6.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCVTX vs. PVCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the PVCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVTX and PVCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCVTX	PVCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	1.43	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.83	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	1.07	-0.63

Drawdowns

FCVTX vs. PVCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVTX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, which is greater than PVCMX's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVTX and PVCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCVTX	PVCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.26%	-7.44%	-50.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-2.81%	-7.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.91%	-7.44%	-17.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.91%	-7.44%	-17.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.24%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-1.28%	-6.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	0.97%	+2.02%

Volatility

FCVTX vs. PVCMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX) at 1.11%. This indicates that FCVTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCVTX	PVCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.08%	1.11%	+4.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.79%	2.76%	+10.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.87%	4.20%	+13.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.94%	5.21%	+15.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.36%	6.31%	+16.05%

FCVTX vs. PVCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVTX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PVCMX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVTX vs. PVCMX - Dividend Comparison

FCVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.99%, more than PVCMX's 4.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCVTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M	8.99%	10.69%	4.91%	5.34%	6.37%	8.00%	0.23%	3.20%	38.15%	3.30%	6.98%	11.13%
PVCMX Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class	4.69%	4.80%	6.95%	4.84%	2.30%	1.98%	2.70%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCVTX and PVCMX in my portfolio?

FCVTX and PVCMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCVTX or PVCMX?

FCVTX has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to PVCMX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVTX dropped -58.26% vs PVCMX's -7.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCVTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.