PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVT vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVT vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVT achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.75% return.


FCVT

1D
0.19%
1M
-4.59%
6M
8.08%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
27.00%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
10.52%

WNTR

1D
3.26%
1M
8.13%
6M
14.92%
YTD
10.75%
1Y
107.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
47.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.38M$2.19M$1.42M
$4.02M$3.86M$3.95M

FCVT vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCVT and WNTR is -0.47, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVT vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCVT
FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCVT vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCVTWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.71

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

6.87

+0.43

FCVT vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVT and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVT vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVT drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVT and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVTWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.79%

-42.65%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.87%

-42.65%

+28.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.08%

-9.64%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-20.18%

+9.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

16.81%

-13.36%

Volatility

FCVT vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) is 7.70%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that FCVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVTWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

14.85%

-7.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.06%

47.43%

-31.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

54.68%

-35.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

53.42%

-38.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

53.42%

-38.43%

FCVT vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVT vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

FCVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than WNTR's 107.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
1.14%1.98%1.30%1.76%3.71%23.07%1.72%1.60%1.85%2.18%1.88%0.59%
WNTR
YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF
107.02%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVT and WNTR have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to FCVT (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVT dropped -31.79% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs 27.00% for FCVT. On fees, FCVT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FCVT has been the lower-risk option at 7.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs 27.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCVT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 1.14% for FCVT.

FCVT is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FCVT and 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVT and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer