FCVT vs. QPFF
FCVT (First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF) and QPFF (American Century Quality Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. FCVT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for QPFF.
Performance
FCVT vs. QPFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCVT
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 7.08%
- YTD
- 25.61%
- 6M
- 25.00%
- 1Y
- 47.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
QPFF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCVT vs. QPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF | 17.82% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% |
FCVT vs. QPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCVT
QPFF
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
FCVT
QPFF
Consumer Cyclical
FCVT
QPFF
Financial Services
FCVT
QPFF
Healthcare
FCVT
QPFF
-
Basic Materials
FCVT
-
QPFF
Communication Services
FCVT
-
QPFF
Consumer Defensive
FCVT
-
QPFF
-
Energy
FCVT
-
QPFF
-
Industrials
FCVT
-
QPFF
Real Estate
FCVT
-
QPFF
Technology
FCVT
-
QPFF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCVT vs. QPFF — Risk / Return Rank
FCVT
QPFF
FCVT vs. QPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCVT | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.97 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.76 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.58 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCVT | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FCVT vs. QPFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCVT drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, which is greater than QPFF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVT and QPFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCVT | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.79% | 0.00% | -31.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | 0.00% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.36% | 0.00% | -10.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility
FCVT vs. QPFF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCVT | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | 0.00% | +15.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 0.00% | +14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 0.00% | +14.85% |
FCVT vs. QPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCVT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QPFF's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCVT vs. QPFF - Dividend Comparison
FCVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while QPFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF | 1.19% | 1.98% | 1.30% | 1.76% | 3.71% | 23.07% | 1.72% | 1.60% | 1.85% | 2.18% | 1.88% | 0.59% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QPFF is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QPFF is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.
FCVT has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for QPFF.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FCVT and 0.33% for QPFF.
Find the right allocation for FCVT and QPFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer