FCVT vs. QCLN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCVT (First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FCVT is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. FCVT is actively managed, while QCLN is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FCVT returned 12.36%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for QCLN. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCVT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.

Performance

FCVT vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVT achieves a 25.61% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 52.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVT has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 12.36%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.

FCVT

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 7.08%
• YTD: 25.61%
• 6M: 25.00%
• 1Y: 47.07%
• 3Y*: 21.35%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: 12.36%

QCLN

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 16.40%
• YTD: 52.94%
• 6M: 50.79%
• 1Y: 120.21%
• 3Y*: 12.03%
• 5Y*: 2.16%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVT vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF	25.61%	19.60%	11.92%	7.12%	-20.88%	4.23%	51.02%	22.30%	-2.28%	12.66%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	52.94%	31.81%	-18.86%	-10.02%	-30.37%	-3.21%	184.00%	42.65%	-12.38%	32.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVT and QCLN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2015	0.66

The correlation between FCVT and QCLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCVT vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCVT	QCLN
Utilities	1.3%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	0.7%	9.4%
Financial Services	0.7%	1.9%
Healthcare	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	9.4%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	13.2%
Industrials	-	30.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	20.8%

Return for Risk

FCVT vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVT

FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 87
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 89
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVT vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCVT	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	3.49	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	3.86	-0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.48	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.58	7.62	-2.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.90	26.28	-5.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCVT vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVT and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCVT	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97	3.49	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.06	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.50	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.20	+0.48

Drawdowns

FCVT vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVT drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVT and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCVT	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.79%	-76.18%	+44.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.47%	-15.86%	+7.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.06%	-56.08%	+41.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.43%	-69.49%	+39.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.79%	-71.73%	+39.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	-20.99%	+19.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.36%	-43.45%	+33.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	4.59%	-2.33%

Volatility

FCVT vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) is 6.07%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that FCVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCVT	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.07%	12.56%	-6.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.99%	26.02%	-13.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.94%	34.88%	-18.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.09%	37.97%	-23.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.85%	34.91%	-20.06%

FCVT vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVT vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

FCVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF	1.19%	1.98%	1.30%	1.76%	3.71%	23.07%	1.72%	1.60%	1.85%	2.18%	1.88%	0.59%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.15%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCVT and QCLN in my portfolio?

FCVT and QCLN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCVT or QCLN?

QCLN has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to FCVT (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVT dropped -31.79% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

Which ETF is better, FCVT or QCLN?

On 10-year performance, QCLN leads with 17.39% vs 12.36% for FCVT. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FCVT has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCVT or QCLN?

Over the 10-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 17.39% return vs 12.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCVT or QCLN?

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCVT or QCLN?

FCVT has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.

What is the main difference between FCVT and QCLN?

FCVT is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FCVT and 0.60% for QCLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.