PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVSX vs. FCCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVSX vs. FCCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCVSX having a 16.72% return and FCCVX slightly lower at 15.92%. Over the past 10 years, FCVSX has outperformed FCCVX with an annualized return of 11.65%, while FCCVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.


FCVSX

1D
1.98%
1M
-1.38%
6M
10.25%
YTD
16.72%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
11.65%
ALL TIME*
10.03%

FCCVX

1D
1.98%
1M
-1.54%
6M
9.60%
YTD
15.92%
1Y
25.35%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
10.91%
ALL TIME*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCVSX vs. FCCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVSX
Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund
16.72%8.52%13.91%11.42%-15.33%9.95%42.52%28.58%-1.29%9.03%
FCCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C
15.92%17.04%7.28%10.24%-16.22%8.77%41.00%27.26%-2.32%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVSX and FCCVX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2009

1.00

The correlation between FCVSX and FCCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVSX vs. FCCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCVSX
FCVSX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FCVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FCCVX
FCCVX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FCCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCVSX vs. FCCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCVSXFCCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.31

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.23

8.74

-4.50

FCVSX vs. FCCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the FCCVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVSX and FCCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVSX vs. FCCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVSX drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, which is greater than FCCVX's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVSX and FCCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVSXFCCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.76%

-25.13%

-33.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-11.62%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.56%

-18.98%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-24.66%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.08%

-25.13%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.92%

-7.16%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-6.18%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

3.07%

+1.12%

Volatility

FCVSX vs. FCCVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) have volatilities of 6.21% and 6.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVSXFCCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

6.21%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.97%

13.94%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

17.05%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

13.92%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

13.86%

+0.22%

FCVSX vs. FCCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVSX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FCCVX's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVSX vs. FCCVX - Dividend Comparison

FCVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than FCCVX's 8.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C
8.37%10.47%1.32%1.12%2.62%19.63%9.96%2.31%8.75%3.35%3.85%9.24%
FCVSX
Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund
1.40%2.21%7.47%2.13%3.78%20.64%10.75%3.28%9.86%4.11%4.90%10.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FCVSX and FCCVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCCVX has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to FCVSX (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVSX dropped -58.76% vs FCCVX's -25.13%.

FCCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVSX and FCCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer