FCVSX vs. CICVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCVSX (Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund) and CICVX (Calamos Convertible Fund) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FCVSX returned 12.91%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for CICVX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCVSX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CICVX.

Performance

FCVSX vs. CICVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCVSX having a 25.40% return and CICVX slightly higher at 26.40%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCVSX having a 12.91% annualized return and CICVX not far behind at 12.56%.

FCVSX

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 7.40%
• YTD: 25.40%
• 6M: 14.56%
• 1Y: 32.57%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 8.91%
• 10Y*: 12.91%

CICVX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 7.82%
• YTD: 26.40%
• 6M: 26.09%
• 1Y: 46.23%
• 3Y*: 20.94%
• 5Y*: 8.59%
• 10Y*: 12.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVSX vs. CICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCVSX Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund	25.40%	8.52%	13.91%	11.42%	-15.33%	9.95%	42.52%	28.58%	-1.29%	9.03%
CICVX Calamos Convertible Fund	26.40%	19.03%	9.94%	10.95%	-21.02%	5.36%	48.84%	19.51%	0.59%	14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVSX and CICVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 1997	0.90

The correlation between FCVSX and CICVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCVSX vs. CICVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVSX

FCVSX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FCVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FCVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FCVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FCVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FCVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CICVX

CICVX Risk / Return Rank: 91
CICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVSX vs. CICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCVSX	CICVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	3.21	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	4.11	-1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.55	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	6.18	-3.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.79	24.05	-14.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCVSX vs. CICVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the CICVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVSX and CICVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCVSX	CICVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	3.21	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.67	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	0.98	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.35	+0.38

Drawdowns

FCVSX vs. CICVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVSX drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, which is greater than CICVX's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVSX and CICVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCVSX	CICVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.76%	-49.33%	-9.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.68%	-7.70%	-2.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.56%	-14.79%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.18%	-27.17%	+2.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.08%	-27.17%	+2.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.22%	-17.48%	+10.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	1.98%	+1.46%

Volatility

FCVSX vs. CICVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) is 4.85%, while Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that FCVSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CICVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCVSX	CICVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	5.22%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.34%	12.17%	+3.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.51%	14.86%	+2.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	12.89%	+1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	12.89%	+0.97%

FCVSX vs. CICVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVSX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than CICVX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVSX vs. CICVX - Dividend Comparison

FCVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than CICVX's 9.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CICVX Calamos Convertible Fund	9.97%	12.51%	1.83%	2.48%	0.94%	15.90%	7.74%	1.39%	16.75%	4.55%	3.43%	5.41%
FCVSX Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund	1.46%	2.21%	7.47%	2.13%	3.78%	20.64%	10.75%	3.28%	9.86%	4.11%	4.90%	10.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCVSX and CICVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FCVSX and CICVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCVSX or CICVX?

CICVX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to FCVSX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVSX dropped -58.76% vs CICVX's -49.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.