FCVIX vs. VB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCVIX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both funds - FCVIX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, FCVIX returned 11.10%/yr vs 11.30%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCVIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.

Performance

FCVIX vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVIX achieves a 19.20% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 14.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCVIX having a 11.10% annualized return and VB not far ahead at 11.30%.

FCVIX

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: 4.29%
• YTD: 19.20%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 34.71%
• 3Y*: 17.29%
• 5Y*: 8.22%
• 10Y*: 11.10%

VB

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 14.16%
• 6M: 14.12%
• 1Y: 28.82%
• 3Y*: 17.05%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 11.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVIX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCVIX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I	19.20%	8.02%	9.36%	17.82%	-13.07%	38.10%	11.21%	20.76%	-15.42%	12.27%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	14.16%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVIX and VB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2004	0.95

The correlation between FCVIX and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCVIX vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCVIX	VB
Financial Services	19.9%	12.6%
Industrials	12.6%	20.8%
Healthcare	11.4%	11.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	11.3%
Technology	10.5%	17.2%
Real Estate	9.7%	7.6%
Energy	6.9%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	3.4%
Basic Materials	6.3%	4.8%
Utilities	4.7%	3.3%
Communication Services	0.6%	3.1%

Return for Risk

FCVIX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVIX

FCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 56
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 48
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVIX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCVIX	VB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	1.78	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	2.56	+0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.31	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	3.22	+0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.66	11.87	+0.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCVIX vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVIX and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCVIX	VB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	1.78	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.34	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.53	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.44	+0.02

Drawdowns

FCVIX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVIX drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVIX and VB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCVIX	VB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.61%	-59.56%	+1.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.35%	-8.98%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.82%	-25.36%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.82%	-28.15%	+4.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.61%	-42.05%	-2.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-0.65%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.97%	-8.44%	+0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	2.43%	+0.53%

Volatility

FCVIX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.42%. This indicates that FCVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCVIX	VB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.06%	4.42%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.76%	11.72%	+1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.83%	16.28%	+1.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.92%	20.74%	+0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.35%	21.42%	+0.93%

FCVIX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVIX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

FCVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, more than VB's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCVIX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I	8.47%	10.10%	6.09%	5.19%	5.92%	7.96%	0.48%	3.49%	36.40%	3.65%	7.15%	11.09%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.19%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCVIX and VB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FCVIX and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCVIX or VB?

FCVIX has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to VB (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVIX dropped -57.61% vs VB's -59.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.