PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVIX vs. HWSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVIX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVIX achieves a 19.20% return, which is significantly higher than HWSAX's 17.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCVIX having a 11.10% annualized return and HWSAX not far behind at 10.74%.


FCVIX

1D
1.97%
1M
4.29%
YTD
19.20%
6M
16.74%
1Y
34.71%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
11.10%

HWSAX

1D
1.03%
1M
2.96%
YTD
17.59%
6M
15.77%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVIX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVIX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I
19.20%8.02%9.36%17.82%-13.07%38.10%11.21%20.76%-15.42%12.27%
HWSAX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A
17.59%1.38%4.77%18.56%2.81%35.32%-0.50%20.26%-15.23%7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVIX and HWSAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2004

0.92

The correlation between FCVIX and HWSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVIX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVIX
FCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HWSAX
HWSAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HWSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HWSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVIX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCVIXHWSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

3.12

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

10.23

+2.43

FCVIX vs. HWSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the HWSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVIX and HWSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCVIXHWSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.82

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.44

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.44

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.48

-0.02

Drawdowns

FCVIX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVIX drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVIX and HWSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVIXHWSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-72.14%

+14.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-10.06%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

-26.98%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-26.98%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.61%

-53.82%

+9.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-10.96%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.06%

-0.10%

Volatility

FCVIX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 3.76%. This indicates that FCVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVIXHWSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

3.76%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.76%

11.25%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

17.23%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

21.54%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

24.62%

-2.27%

FCVIX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVIX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison

FCVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, more than HWSAX's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVIX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I
8.47%10.10%6.09%5.19%5.92%7.96%0.48%3.49%36.40%3.65%7.15%11.09%
HWSAX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A
0.59%0.69%8.19%1.79%13.39%0.22%0.63%4.62%9.45%4.80%0.00%11.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVIX and HWSAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCVIX has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to HWSAX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVIX dropped -57.61% vs HWSAX's -72.14%.

FCVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVIX and HWSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer