PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVFX vs. CIMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCVFX vs. CIMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCVFX vs. CIMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVFX
Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C
0.00%10.14%24.29%18.53%-10.07%33.72%8.57%30.36%-18.65%12.05%
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
-6.99%7.35%5.67%10.38%-3.67%6.23%23.21%23.74%-7.85%11.25%

Returns By Period


FCVFX

1D
-0.70%
1M
-8.82%
YTD
0.00%
6M
4.58%
1Y
16.79%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
10.56%
10Y*
11.10%

CIMDX

1D
0.92%
1M
-8.15%
YTD
-6.99%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
0.79%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCVFX vs. CIMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVFX has a 1.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CIMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FCVFX vs. CIMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVFX
FCVFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FCVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CIMDX
CIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVFX vs. CIMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCVFXCIMDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

0.07

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

0.24

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.03

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

0.00

+0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.01

0.01

+4.00

FCVFX vs. CIMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the CIMDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVFX and CIMDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCVFXCIMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.07

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.10

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.40

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between FCVFX and CIMDX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FCVFX vs. CIMDX - Dividend Comparison

FCVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.22%, more than CIMDX's 3.49% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVFX
Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C
8.22%8.22%25.20%0.12%0.00%4.16%0.00%2.46%14.34%2.34%0.00%1.94%
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
3.49%3.24%0.45%1.62%6.38%0.44%0.91%3.32%2.27%0.41%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCVFX vs. CIMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVFX drawdown since its inception was -65.18%, which is greater than CIMDX's maximum drawdown of -31.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVFX and CIMDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVFXCIMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.18%

-31.86%

-33.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.97%

-11.30%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.11%

-21.26%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.99%

-10.49%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-5.88%

-3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

3.57%

+0.09%

Volatility

FCVFX vs. CIMDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) at 4.56%. This indicates that FCVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCVFXCIMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

4.56%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

11.25%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

18.62%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.28%

15.78%

+5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

17.50%

+5.01%