FCVCX vs. QRSVX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FCVCX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C) and QRSVX (FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FCVCX returned 8.25%/yr vs 11.96%/yr for QRSVX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCVCX charges 2.02%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for QRSVX.

Performance

FCVCX vs. QRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVCX achieves a 22.62% return, which is significantly lower than QRSVX's 25.25% return.

FCVCX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 4.79%
• YTD: 22.62%
• 6M: 19.87%
• 1Y: 34.97%
• 3Y*: 17.35%
• 5Y*: 8.25%
• 10Y*: 10.69%

QRSVX

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: 25.25%
• 6M: 22.79%
• 1Y: 35.17%
• 3Y*: 21.67%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVCX vs. QRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCVCX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C	22.62%	6.93%	6.82%	16.65%	-13.97%	36.71%	2.99%
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class	25.25%	13.37%	10.72%	16.04%	-9.14%	23.16%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVCX and QRSVX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020	0.93

The correlation between FCVCX and QRSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCVCX vs. QRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVCX

FCVCX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FCVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FCVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FCVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FCVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FCVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

QRSVX

QRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 84
QRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
QRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVCX vs. QRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCVCX	QRSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.40	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	3.59	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.42	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	4.61	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.23	16.26	-4.03

FCVCX vs. QRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the QRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVCX and QRSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCVCX vs. QRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVCX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than QRSVX's maximum drawdown of -20.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVCX and QRSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCVCX	QRSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.55%	-20.59%	-37.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-7.93%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.11%	-18.91%	-6.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.11%	-20.59%	-4.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-0.77%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.46%	-4.85%	-3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	2.24%	+0.76%

Volatility

FCVCX vs. QRSVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) at 4.70%. This indicates that FCVCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCVCX	QRSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.86%	4.70%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.45%	10.72%	+2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.17%	15.29%	+2.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.96%	17.48%	+3.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.37%	17.46%	+4.91%

FCVCX vs. QRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVCX has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than QRSVX's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVCX vs. QRSVX - Dividend Comparison

FCVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.07%, more than QRSVX's 3.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCVCX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C	10.07%	12.35%	5.46%	5.97%	7.23%	8.53%	0.13%	3.34%	41.61%	3.03%	7.26%	11.44%
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class	3.55%	4.45%	4.86%	2.56%	2.07%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCVCX and QRSVX in my portfolio?

FCVCX and QRSVX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCVCX or QRSVX?

FCVCX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to QRSVX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVCX dropped -58.55% vs QRSVX's -20.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.