PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCUV.TO vs. FBTC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCUV.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCUV.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCUV.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value ETF
1.19%14.80%35.81%19.98%2.58%4.08%
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
-21.62%-10.85%137.16%145.80%-61.34%-20.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUV.TO achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC.TO's -21.62% return.


FCUV.TO

1D
0.51%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
1.19%
6M
5.84%
1Y
15.29%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
19.38%
10Y*

FBTC.TO

1D
1.70%
1M
5.18%
YTD
-21.62%
6M
-40.83%
1Y
-20.77%
3Y*
33.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCUV.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUV.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FCUV.TO vs. FBTC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUV.TO
FCUV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC.TO
FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUV.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCUV.TOFBTC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

-0.47

+1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

-0.41

+1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.95

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

-0.43

+1.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.06

-0.91

+5.98

FCUV.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUV.TO and FBTC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCUV.TOFBTC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

-0.47

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

0.10

+1.31

Correlation

The correlation between FCUV.TO and FBTC.TO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FCUV.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCUV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while FBTC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FCUV.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value ETF
1.04%1.13%1.03%1.42%2.71%1.40%1.14%
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCUV.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUV.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum FBTC.TO drawdown of -70.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUV.TO and FBTC.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCUV.TOFBTC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-70.77%

+54.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-50.22%

+38.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-46.48%

+42.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-30.53%

+27.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

23.72%

-20.38%

Volatility

FCUV.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) is 4.76%, while Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) has a volatility of 13.01%. This indicates that FCUV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCUV.TOFBTC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

13.01%

-8.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

36.24%

-24.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.10%

44.80%

-25.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

52.99%

-37.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

52.99%

-38.27%