FCUS vs. KMID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) and KMID (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FCUS returned 87.27% vs -0.30% for KMID. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for KMID.

Performance

FCUS vs. KMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 43.18% return, which is significantly higher than KMID's 0.87% return.

FCUS

• 1D: -3.77%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 43.18%
• 6M: 40.26%
• 1Y: 87.27%
• 3Y*: 34.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KMID

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: -0.56%
• 1Y: -0.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUS vs. KMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	43.18%	13.69%	4.88%
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	0.87%	0.31%	-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUS and KMID is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024	0.46

FCUS vs. KMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCUS	KMID
Technology	53.3%	15.8%
Energy	17.1%	-
Basic Materials	11.1%	-
Industrials	9.2%	52.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	8.7%
Healthcare	2.6%	11.5%
Communication Services	2.2%	-
Financial Services	-	11.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FCUS vs. KMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUS

FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 78
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

KMID

KMID Risk / Return Rank: 8
KMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
KMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
KMID Omega Ratio Rank: 8
KMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
KMID Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUS vs. KMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCUS	KMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	-0.02	+2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	0.08	+2.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.01	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.96	-0.03	+4.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.12	-0.07	+17.19

FCUS vs. KMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the KMID Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUS and KMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCUS vs. KMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, which is greater than KMID's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and KMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCUS	KMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.89%	-18.89%	-21.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-10.71%	-6.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.59%	-6.21%	+1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.51%	-5.74%	-1.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.11%	4.36%	+0.75%

Volatility

FCUS vs. KMID - Volatility Comparison

Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a higher volatility of 12.35% compared to Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) at 5.05%. This indicates that FCUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCUS	KMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.35%	5.05%	+7.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.05%	11.71%	+15.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.63%	14.88%	+20.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.33%	16.99%	+13.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.33%	16.99%	+13.34%

FCUS vs. KMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KMID's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCUS vs. KMID - Dividend Comparison

FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than KMID's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	3.02%	4.33%	11.19%
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	0.12%	0.06%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCUS and KMID in my portfolio?

FCUS and KMID have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCUS or KMID?

FCUS has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to KMID (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCUS dropped -39.89% vs KMID's -18.89%.

Which ETF is better, FCUS or KMID?

On 1-year performance, FCUS leads with 87.27% vs -0.30% for KMID. On fees, FCUS is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KMID has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCUS or KMID?

Over the 1-year period, FCUS has performed better with a 87.27% return vs -0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCUS or KMID?

FCUS is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for KMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCUS or KMID?

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 0.12% for KMID.

What is the main difference between FCUS and KMID?

They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.80% for KMID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.