FCUS vs. FEMG
FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) and FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FEMG.
Performance
FCUS vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCUS
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 50.06%
- 6M
- 52.19%
- 1Y
- 96.08%
- 3Y*
- 37.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEMG
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCUS vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 13.68% |
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 4.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCUS and FEMG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026 | 0.20 |
FCUS vs. FEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCUS
FEMG
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FCUS
FEMG
Energy
FCUS
FEMG
Industrials
FCUS
FEMG
Basic Materials
FCUS
FEMG
Healthcare
FCUS
FEMG
Consumer Defensive
FCUS
FEMG
Consumer Cyclical
FCUS
FEMG
Communication Services
FCUS
FEMG
Financial Services
FCUS
-
FEMG
Real Estate
FCUS
-
FEMG
Utilities
FCUS
-
FEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCUS vs. FEMG — Risk / Return Rank
FCUS
FEMG
FCUS vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCUS | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCUS | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 4.78 | -3.65 |
Drawdowns
FCUS vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and FEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCUS | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.89% | -3.29% | -36.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.18% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -0.96% | -6.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | — | — |
Volatility
FCUS vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCUS | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.92% | 12.29% | +21.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 12.29% | +17.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 12.29% | +17.69% |
FCUS vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCUS vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison
FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 2.89% | 4.33% | 11.19% |
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCUS and FEMG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.
FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.
They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.23% for FEMG.
Find the right allocation for FCUS and FEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer