PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCUS vs. FEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCUS vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCUS

1D
0.90%
1M
10.76%
YTD
50.06%
6M
52.19%
1Y
96.08%
3Y*
37.64%
5Y*
10Y*

FEMG

1D
-0.84%
1M
3.74%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUS vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCUS and FEMG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026

0.20

FCUS vs. FEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCUS
FEMG

Technology

40.7%
24.0%

Energy

18.2%
3.3%

Industrials

15.3%
26.5%

Basic Materials

10.1%
0.7%

Healthcare

6.2%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
17.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.7%

Financial Services

-

6.0%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Technology

FCUS
40.7%
FEMG
24.0%

Energy

FCUS
18.2%
FEMG
3.3%

Industrials

FCUS
15.3%
FEMG
26.5%

Basic Materials

FCUS
10.1%
FEMG
0.7%

Healthcare

FCUS
6.2%
FEMG
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

FCUS
4.4%
FEMG
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FCUS
2.9%
FEMG
17.4%

Communication Services

FCUS
2.2%
FEMG
2.7%

Financial Services

FCUS

-

FEMG
6.0%

Real Estate

FCUS

-

FEMG
1.8%

Utilities

FCUS

-

FEMG
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCUS vs. FEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUS
FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUS vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCUSFEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.54

FCUS vs. FEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCUSFEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

4.78

-3.65

Drawdowns

FCUS vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and FEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCUSFEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.89%

-3.29%

-36.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.18%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-0.96%

-6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

Volatility

FCUS vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCUSFEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.92%

12.29%

+21.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.98%

12.29%

+17.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.98%

12.29%

+17.69%

FCUS vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCUS vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison

FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
2.89%4.33%11.19%
FEMG
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCUS and FEMG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.

They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.23% for FEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCUS and FEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer