FCUS vs. DOGG
FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) and DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCUS is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Pinnacle, while DOGG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FCUS returned 24.04%/yr vs 12.53%/yr for DOGG. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FCUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DOGG.
Performance
FCUS vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than DOGG's 11.92% return.
FCUS
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- -8.75%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 18.26%
- 1Y
- 40.09%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.63%
DOGG
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 22.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $946.83K | $808.54K | $736.30K | |
| $956.27K | $910.42K | $1.11M |
FCUS vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 18.26% | 13.69% | 30.59% | 20.79% |
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 11.92% | 19.43% | -2.58% | 12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCUS and DOGG is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023 | 0.10 |
The correlation between FCUS and DOGG shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCUS vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank
FCUS
DOGG
FCUS vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCUS | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.74 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 5.78 | -0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCUS vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and DOGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCUS | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.89% | -11.19% | -28.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.26% | -8.29% | -22.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.89% | -11.19% | -28.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.19% | -1.62% | -19.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -3.26% | -4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.20% | 3.92% | +4.28% |
Volatility
FCUS vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) at 4.29%. This indicates that FCUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCUS | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.30% | 4.29% | +15.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.85% | 9.23% | +24.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.79% | 11.35% | +30.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.17% | 13.05% | +19.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.17% | 13.05% | +19.12% |
FCUS vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCUS vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison
FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than DOGG's 8.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 8.56% | 8.75% | 9.92% | 5.89% |
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 3.66% | 4.33% | 11.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCUS and DOGG have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCUS has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to DOGG (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCUS dropped -39.89% vs DOGG's -11.19%.
On 3-year performance, FCUS leads with 24.04% vs 12.53% for DOGG. On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DOGG has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FCUS has performed better with a 24.04% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.
DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.56%, compared with 3.66% for FCUS.
FCUS is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while DOGG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.75% for DOGG.
DOGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCUS and DOGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer