PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCUQ.TO (Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF) and XMTM.TO (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCUQ.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada U.S. High Quality Index, while XMTM.TO is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCUQ.TO returned 14.68%/yr vs 17.92%/yr for XMTM.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCUQ.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for XMTM.TO.

Performance

FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUQ.TO achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly lower than XMTM.TO's 33.39% return.

FCUQ.TO

1D
-0.47%
1M
8.68%
YTD
7.92%
6M
4.08%
1Y
14.01%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
—

XMTM.TO

1D
4.00%
1M
19.00%
YTD
33.39%
6M
29.32%
1Y
40.58%
3Y*
35.55%
5Y*
17.92%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCUQ.TO
Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF		7.92%4.67%32.89%20.05%-11.48%31.73%13.51%5.97%
XMTM.TO
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF		33.39%14.02%43.59%6.48%-14.53%15.01%25.77%3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUQ.TO and XMTM.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2019

0.44

Over the past year, FCUQ.TO and XMTM.TO have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FCUQ.TO
XMTM.TO

Technology

42.0%
44.7%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
3.7%

Industrials

12.4%
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.0%
3.3%

Basic Materials

7.3%
1.7%

Financial Services

6.3%
10.5%

Communication Services

4.3%
7.0%

Healthcare

2.8%
7.0%

Energy

-

3.6%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Technology

FCUQ.TO
42.0%
XMTM.TO
44.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FCUQ.TO
14.8%
XMTM.TO
3.7%

Industrials

FCUQ.TO
12.4%
XMTM.TO
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

FCUQ.TO
10.0%
XMTM.TO
3.3%

Basic Materials

FCUQ.TO
7.3%
XMTM.TO
1.7%

Financial Services

FCUQ.TO
6.3%
XMTM.TO
10.5%

Communication Services

FCUQ.TO
4.3%
XMTM.TO
7.0%

Healthcare

FCUQ.TO
2.8%
XMTM.TO
7.0%

Energy

FCUQ.TO

-

XMTM.TO
3.6%

Real Estate

FCUQ.TO

-

XMTM.TO
1.8%

Utilities

FCUQ.TO

-

XMTM.TO
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF

Often compared with FCUQ.TO:
FCUQ.TO vs. HULC.TOFCUQ.TO vs. ETSX.TOFCUQ.TO vs. CNCL.TOFCUQ.TO vs. FCUV.TOFCUQ.TO vs. FBTC.TOFCUQ.TO vs. VDY.TOFCUQ.TO vs. FCID.TO
Often compared with XMTM.TO:
XMTM.TO vs. SPMOXMTM.TO vs. VMO.TOXMTM.TO vs. VFV.TOXMTM.TO vs. XCHP.TOXMTM.TO vs. FEQT.NEOXMTM.TO vs. QQC.TOXMTM.TO vs. VOO

Return for Risk

FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FCUQ.TO
FCUQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FCUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
XMTM.TO
XMTM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XMTM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMTM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMTM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XMTM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMTM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FCUQ.TOXMTM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.23
2.20

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.78
3.07

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

3.57

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

10.21

-6.41

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the XMTM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUQ.TO and XMTM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FCUQ.TOXMTM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.20

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.96

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.88

+0.04

Drawdowns

FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.36%, smaller than the maximum XMTM.TO drawdown of -29.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUQ.TO and XMTM.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FCUQ.TOXMTM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.36%

-29.01%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-11.42%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

-20.64%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.73%

-29.01%

+6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

0.00%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-7.96%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

3.99%

-0.29%

Volatility

FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO) is 3.37%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that FCUQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMTM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FCUQ.TOXMTM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

7.86%

-4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

16.02%

-6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.49%

18.57%

-7.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.62%

18.79%

-4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

20.07%

-2.76%

FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUQ.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XMTM.TO's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCUQ.TO vs. XMTM.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCUQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than XMTM.TO's 0.46% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FCUQ.TO
Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF		0.67%0.73%0.77%0.88%1.04%0.79%1.15%0.82%
XMTM.TO
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF		0.46%0.70%0.62%0.84%1.66%0.33%0.64%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

FCUQ.TO and XMTM.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMTM.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMTM.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FCUQ.TO.

FCUQ.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XMTM.TO is Momentum. FCUQ.TO tracks Fidelity Canada U.S. High Quality Index, while XMTM.TO tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCUQ.TO and 0.31% for XMTM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCUQ.TO and XMTM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer