FCTGX vs. KSOAX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FCTGX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M) and KSOAX (Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCTGX returned 13.69%/yr vs 19.27%/yr for KSOAX. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FCTGX charges 1.54%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for KSOAX.

Performance

FCTGX vs. KSOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) and Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCTGX having a 20.57% return and KSOAX slightly higher at 21.01%. Over the past 10 years, FCTGX has underperformed KSOAX with an annualized return of 13.69%, while KSOAX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.27% annualized return.

FCTGX

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: -3.11%
• 6M: 16.08%
• YTD: 20.57%
• 1Y: 35.89%
• 3Y*: 18.08%
• 5Y*: 7.34%
• 10Y*: 13.69%
• ALL TIME*: 11.17%

KSOAX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -1.34%
• 6M: 6.83%
• YTD: 21.01%
• 1Y: 16.13%
• 3Y*: 24.16%
• 5Y*: 14.63%
• 10Y*: 19.27%
• ALL TIME*: 11.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
KSOAX Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FCTGX vs. KSOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M	20.57%	10.58%	19.92%	18.39%	-25.72%	9.89%	35.65%	35.62%	-5.10%	28.28%
KSOAX Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A	21.01%	-8.89%	68.00%	-14.98%	31.64%	49.94%	2.04%	26.72%	0.00%	25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTGX and KSOAX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between FCTGX and KSOAX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FCTGX vs. KSOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCTGX

FCTGX Risk / Return Rank: 57
FCTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FCTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FCTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FCTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FCTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

KSOAX

KSOAX Risk / Return Rank: 12
KSOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
KSOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
KSOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
KSOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
KSOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCTGX vs. KSOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) and Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCTGX	KSOAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	0.45	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	0.80	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.10	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	0.58	+1.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.11	1.31	+7.80

FCTGX vs. KSOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the KSOAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTGX and KSOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCTGX vs. KSOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTGX drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, smaller than the maximum KSOAX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTGX and KSOAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCTGX	KSOAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.25%	-70.21%	+8.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.22%	-21.60%	+8.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.84%	-33.28%	+4.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.21%	-33.28%	-5.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.21%	-47.11%	+7.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.27%	-17.22%	+11.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.53%	-15.88%	+4.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	9.64%	-6.11%

Volatility

FCTGX vs. KSOAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) is 6.02%, while Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that FCTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCTGX	KSOAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	7.17%	-1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.97%	22.35%	-4.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.71%	27.68%	-4.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.71%	28.02%	-4.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.94%	26.32%	-3.38%

FCTGX vs. KSOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTGX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than KSOAX's 1.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCTGX vs. KSOAX - Dividend Comparison

FCTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, while KSOAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M	6.17%	7.44%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%	21.26%	8.90%	5.81%	15.13%	7.17%	0.81%	4.23%
KSOAX Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	3.52%	6.72%	0.00%	1.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCTGX and KSOAX in my portfolio?

FCTGX and KSOAX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCTGX or KSOAX?

KSOAX has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to FCTGX (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTGX dropped -61.25% vs KSOAX's -70.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.