FCTFX vs. FCNTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund (FCTFX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).
FCTFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 7, 1984. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.
Performance
FCTFX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCTFX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTFX Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund | -1.07% | 5.75% | 1.89% | 6.53% | -9.64% | 1.39% | 4.50% | 7.63% | 0.68% | 5.81% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -8.57% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCTFX achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FCTFX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 2.02%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.
FCTFX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
FCNTX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -9.40%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 6M
- -6.17%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCTFX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCTFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCTFX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
FCTFX
FCNTX
FCTFX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund (FCTFX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCTFX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 0.83 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.30 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 1.17 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.87 | 4.57 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCTFX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.83 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.67 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.80 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.76 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCTFX and FCNTX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FCTFX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
FCTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than FCNTX's 5.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTFX Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund | 3.01% | 3.86% | 2.85% | 2.67% | 1.67% | 2.28% | 2.79% | 2.84% | 3.01% | 3.53% | 3.52% | 3.03% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 5.10% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
FCTFX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCTFX drawdown since its inception was -23.20%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTFX and FCNTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCTFX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.20% | -49.19% | +25.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -11.30% | +6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.01% | -32.59% | +18.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.01% | -32.59% | +18.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -11.30% | +8.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -8.18% | +5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 2.90% | -1.51% |
Volatility
FCTFX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund (FCTFX) is 1.17%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that FCTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCTFX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 5.19% | -4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.77% | 10.56% | -8.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.99% | 19.69% | -14.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 19.13% | -15.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 19.61% | -15.57% |