PortfoliosLab logo
FCTFX vs. PWZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FCTFX and PWZ is -0.63. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

FCTFX vs. PWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund (FCTFX) and Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FCTFX:

1.28%

PWZ:

2.93%

Max Drawdown

FCTFX:

0.00%

PWZ:

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

FCTFX:

0.00%

PWZ:

0.00%

Returns By Period


FCTFX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PWZ

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCTFX vs. PWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PWZ's 0.28% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCTFX vs. PWZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCTFX is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCTFX is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCTFX is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCTFX is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCTFX is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCTFX is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PWZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PWZ is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PWZ is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PWZ is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PWZ is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PWZ is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PWZ is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCTFX vs. PWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund (FCTFX) and Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

FCTFX vs. PWZ - Dividend Comparison

FCTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than PWZ's 3.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCTFX
Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund
2.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCTFX vs. PWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTFX drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PWZ drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTFX and PWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FCTFX vs. PWZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...