FCTFX vs. VCLAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund (FCTFX) and Vanguard California Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares (VCLAX).
FCTFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 7, 1984. VCLAX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 12, 2001.
Performance
FCTFX vs. VCLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCTFX vs. VCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTFX Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund | -1.07% | 5.75% | 1.89% | 6.53% | -9.64% | 1.39% | 4.50% | 7.63% | 0.68% | 5.81% |
VCLAX Vanguard California Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares | -0.99% | 4.97% | 2.77% | 7.60% | -9.99% | 1.50% | 5.68% | 8.91% | 0.76% | 6.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCTFX achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than VCLAX's -0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FCTFX has underperformed VCLAX with an annualized return of 2.02%, while VCLAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.49% annualized return.
FCTFX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
VCLAX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCTFX vs. VCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCTFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLAX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCTFX vs. VCLAX — Risk / Return Rank
FCTFX
VCLAX
FCTFX vs. VCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund (FCTFX) and Vanguard California Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares (VCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCTFX | VCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 0.90 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.22 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.98 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.87 | 3.00 | +0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCTFX | VCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.90 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.26 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.55 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.92 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCTFX and VCLAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCTFX vs. VCLAX - Dividend Comparison
FCTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than VCLAX's 3.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTFX Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund | 3.01% | 3.86% | 2.85% | 2.67% | 1.67% | 2.28% | 2.79% | 2.84% | 3.01% | 3.53% | 3.52% | 3.03% |
VCLAX Vanguard California Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares | 3.63% | 4.41% | 3.95% | 3.07% | 2.74% | 2.60% | 3.28% | 3.24% | 3.41% | 3.32% | 3.56% | 3.58% |
Drawdowns
FCTFX vs. VCLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCTFX drawdown since its inception was -23.20%, which is greater than VCLAX's maximum drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTFX and VCLAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCTFX | VCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.20% | -15.72% | -7.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -5.34% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.01% | -15.72% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.01% | -15.72% | +1.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -3.17% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -2.19% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 1.75% | -0.36% |
Volatility
FCTFX vs. VCLAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund (FCTFX) is 1.17%, while Vanguard California Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares (VCLAX) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that FCTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCTFX | VCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 1.26% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.77% | 1.96% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.99% | 5.44% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 4.52% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 4.54% | -0.50% |