FCSTX vs. FMNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (FCSTX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX).
FCSTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 25, 2005. FMNDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 15, 2013.
Performance
FCSTX vs. FMNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCSTX vs. FMNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSTX Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund | -0.49% | 5.23% | 1.73% | 3.53% | -4.71% | 0.20% | 2.93% | 4.07% | 1.25% | 2.27% |
FMNDX Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class | 0.30% | 3.31% | 3.04% | 3.37% | -0.09% | 0.03% | 0.86% | 2.00% | 1.58% | 1.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCSTX achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than FMNDX's 0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FCSTX has underperformed FMNDX with an annualized return of 1.43%, while FMNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.55% annualized return.
FCSTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 2.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.43%
FMNDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 2.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.04%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCSTX vs. FMNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCSTX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FMNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCSTX vs. FMNDX — Risk / Return Rank
FCSTX
FMNDX
FCSTX vs. FMNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (FCSTX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCSTX | FMNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 3.03 | -1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 7.14 | -4.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 2.89 | -1.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 7.66 | -5.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 29.53 | -22.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCSTX | FMNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 3.03 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 1.90 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 1.74 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 1.66 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCSTX and FMNDX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCSTX vs. FMNDX - Dividend Comparison
FCSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FMNDX's 2.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSTX Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund | 2.22% | 2.85% | 2.00% | 1.68% | 1.01% | 1.22% | 1.68% | 1.72% | 1.71% | 1.58% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
FMNDX Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class | 2.64% | 2.95% | 2.99% | 2.60% | 0.61% | 0.23% | 0.85% | 1.58% | 1.46% | 1.00% | 0.75% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
FCSTX vs. FMNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSTX drawdown since its inception was -7.58%, which is greater than FMNDX's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSTX and FMNDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCSTX | FMNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -1.69% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.21% | -0.40% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.58% | -1.09% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.58% | -1.69% | -5.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -0.30% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -0.10% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.10% | +0.47% |
Volatility
FCSTX vs. FMNDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (FCSTX) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) at 0.16%. This indicates that FCSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCSTX | FMNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 0.16% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.00% | 0.62% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31% | 1.01% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.08% | 1.05% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 0.90% | +1.30% |