FMNDX vs. FMBIX
FMNDX (Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class) and FMBIX (Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Fidelity. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FMBIX.
Performance
FMNDX vs. FMBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FMNDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
FMBIX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMNDX vs. FMBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMNDX Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class | 1.01% | 3.31% | 3.04% | 3.37% | -0.09% | 0.03% | 0.86% | 0.73% |
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 5.89% | -10.00% | 1.14% | 3.10% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMNDX and FMBIX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMNDX vs. FMBIX — Risk / Return Rank
FMNDX
FMBIX
FMNDX vs. FMBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMNDX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.17 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 8.51 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.45 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.81 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.05 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMNDX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.70 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FMNDX vs. FMBIX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMNDX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -1.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | — | — |
Volatility
FMNDX vs. FMBIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMNDX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.06% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.91% | — | — |
FMNDX vs. FMBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBIX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FMNDX vs. FMBIX - Dividend Comparison
FMNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while FMBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.60% | 2.29% | 1.17% | 1.28% | 1.59% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FMNDX Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class | 2.82% | 2.95% | 2.99% | 2.60% | 0.61% | 0.23% | 0.85% | 1.58% | 1.46% | 1.00% | 0.75% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMNDX and FMBIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FMNDX and FMBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer