PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCSTX vs. FUMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCSTX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (FCSTX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSTX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than FUMBX's 0.19% return.


FCSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.89%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
1.50%

FUMBX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.46%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSTX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCSTX
Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund
0.50%5.23%1.73%3.53%-4.71%0.20%2.93%4.07%1.25%-0.63%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.19%5.83%3.25%4.47%-5.84%-1.38%4.22%4.19%1.47%-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSTX and FUMBX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCSTX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSTX
FCSTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FCSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FUMBX
FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSTX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (FCSTX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCSTXFUMBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.66

1.60

+1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.18

2.58

+1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.84

1.32

+0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.36

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.35

7.59

-1.25

FCSTX vs. FUMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the FUMBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSTX and FUMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCSTXFUMBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

1.60

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.44

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.73

+0.52

Drawdowns

FCSTX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSTX drawdown since its inception was -7.58%, smaller than the maximum FUMBX drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSTX and FUMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCSTXFUMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-8.83%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.88%

-1.54%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.21%

-1.57%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.58%

-8.60%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.77%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-1.86%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.48%

+0.17%

Volatility

FCSTX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (FCSTX) is 0.54%, while Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) has a volatility of 0.69%. This indicates that FCSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCSTXFUMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

0.69%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.19%

1.51%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47%

2.06%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.10%

2.92%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.21%

2.49%

-0.28%

FCSTX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSTX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCSTX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison

FCSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than FUMBX's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCSTX
Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund
2.29%2.85%2.00%1.68%1.01%1.22%1.68%1.72%1.71%1.58%1.89%1.63%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.76%3.51%2.91%1.64%0.86%1.15%1.41%1.88%1.64%0.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCSTX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUMBX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to FCSTX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSTX dropped -7.58% vs FUMBX's -8.83%.

FCSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCSTX and FUMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer