FCSSX vs. FFGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I (FFGIX).
FCSSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 30, 2009. FFGIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009.
Performance
FCSSX vs. FFGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCSSX vs. FFGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund | 16.55% | 15.43% | 5.36% | -8.25% | -47.85% | 27.59% | -3.11% | 7.41% | -12.10% | 0.92% |
FFGIX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I | 22.84% | 28.57% | 2.97% | -5.17% | 20.69% | 26.14% | 6.12% | 18.02% | -13.14% | 17.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCSSX achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly lower than FFGIX's 22.84% return. Over the past 10 years, FCSSX has underperformed FFGIX with an annualized return of -1.11%, while FFGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.87% annualized return.
FCSSX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 22.88%
- 1Y
- 23.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- -4.11%
- 10Y*
- -1.11%
FFGIX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 22.84%
- 6M
- 31.17%
- 1Y
- 52.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 15.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCSSX vs. FFGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCSSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGIX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCSSX vs. FFGIX — Risk / Return Rank
FCSSX
FFGIX
FCSSX vs. FFGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I (FFGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCSSX | FFGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 2.56 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 3.07 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.49 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 3.45 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 17.82 | -10.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCSSX | FFGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.56 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.74 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.62 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | 0.35 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCSSX and FFGIX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCSSX vs. FFGIX - Dividend Comparison
FCSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than FFGIX's 1.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund | 2.31% | 2.69% | 12.74% | 4.53% | 1.27% | 41.74% | 0.44% | 1.49% | 6.76% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFGIX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I | 1.98% | 2.44% | 2.61% | 2.08% | 1.90% | 3.43% | 1.53% | 3.21% | 2.41% | 0.36% | 1.65% | 2.96% |
Drawdowns
FCSSX vs. FFGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSSX drawdown since its inception was -73.85%, which is greater than FFGIX's maximum drawdown of -57.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSSX and FFGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCSSX | FFGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.85% | -57.17% | -16.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.20% | -14.66% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.47% | -27.23% | -39.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.47% | -48.29% | -18.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.50% | -2.33% | -59.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.50% | -19.41% | -25.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 2.84% | +0.44% |
Volatility
FCSSX vs. FFGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) is 5.41%, while Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I (FFGIX) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that FCSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCSSX | FFGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 6.10% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 13.76% | -2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 20.50% | -5.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.81% | 21.53% | +7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 22.54% | -0.32% |