PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCSSX vs. BRCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCSSX vs. BRCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSSX achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly lower than BRCAX's 32.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FCSSX has underperformed BRCAX with an annualized return of 6.53%, while BRCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.75% annualized return.


FCSSX

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
21.09%
6M
21.06%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
6.53%

BRCAX

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
32.52%
6M
33.47%
1Y
51.63%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
7.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSSX vs. BRCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCSSX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund
21.09%15.43%5.36%-8.25%18.11%27.59%-3.11%7.41%-12.10%0.92%
BRCAX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
32.52%18.41%5.47%-3.44%7.77%19.18%7.75%4.20%-12.18%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSSX and BRCAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2010

0.83

The correlation between FCSSX and BRCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCSSX vs. BRCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSSX
FCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BRCAX
BRCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BRCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BRCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSSX vs. BRCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCSSXBRCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.55

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

5.70

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.93

22.91

-10.98

FCSSX vs. BRCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the BRCAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSSX and BRCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCSSXBRCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

3.05

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.75

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.54

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.18

-0.08

Drawdowns

FCSSX vs. BRCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSSX drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, which is greater than BRCAX's maximum drawdown of -60.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSSX and BRCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCSSXBRCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.04%

-60.98%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-9.22%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.43%

-9.25%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-20.66%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-38.44%

+5.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.40%

-4.82%

-4.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-28.50%

-7.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.29%

+0.45%

Volatility

FCSSX vs. BRCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) is 4.53%, while Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that FCSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCSSXBRCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

5.36%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

15.49%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

17.29%

-3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

15.80%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.34%

14.30%

+0.04%

FCSSX vs. BRCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BRCAX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCSSX vs. BRCAX - Dividend Comparison

FCSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than BRCAX's 10.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRCAX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
10.58%14.02%4.85%3.80%9.98%16.92%0.00%0.89%0.17%0.00%2.58%
FCSSX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund
2.22%2.69%12.74%4.53%128.24%41.74%0.44%1.49%6.76%0.53%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCSSX and BRCAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRCAX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to FCSSX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSSX dropped -66.04% vs BRCAX's -60.98%.

BRCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCSSX and BRCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer