FCSPX vs. SIDCX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FCSPX (Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port) and SIDCX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FCSPX returned 3.36%/yr vs 2.25%/yr for SIDCX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCSPX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for SIDCX.

Performance

FCSPX vs. SIDCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSPX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than SIDCX's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FCSPX has outperformed SIDCX with an annualized return of 3.36%, while SIDCX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.25% annualized return.

FCSPX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.73%
• 1Y: 6.49%
• 3Y*: 5.73%
• 5Y*: 0.65%
• 10Y*: 3.36%

SIDCX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.32%
• 1Y: 5.01%
• 3Y*: 4.50%
• 5Y*: -0.03%
• 10Y*: 2.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSPX vs. SIDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCSPX Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port	0.57%	8.13%	2.78%	8.48%	-16.25%	-0.95%	11.90%	16.59%	-3.05%	8.03%
SIDCX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund	0.37%	7.40%	1.92%	6.58%	-15.78%	-1.66%	10.68%	12.43%	-1.61%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSPX and SIDCX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2015	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between FCSPX and SIDCX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FCSPX vs. SIDCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSPX

FCSPX Risk / Return Rank: 31
FCSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FCSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FCSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FCSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

SIDCX

SIDCX Risk / Return Rank: 23
SIDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SIDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
SIDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SIDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SIDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSPX vs. SIDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCSPX	SIDCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.31	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	1.97	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.23	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	1.82	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.17	5.72	+1.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCSPX vs. SIDCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the SIDCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSPX and SIDCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCSPX	SIDCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	1.31	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	-0.00	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.40	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.41	+0.17

Drawdowns

FCSPX vs. SIDCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSPX drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, which is greater than SIDCX's maximum drawdown of -21.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSPX and SIDCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCSPX	SIDCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.68%	-21.47%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.19%	-3.10%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.14%	-6.38%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.68%	-21.39%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.68%	-21.47%	-1.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-3.02%	+2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.14%	-5.22%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.98%	-0.06%

Volatility

FCSPX vs. SIDCX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX) have volatilities of 1.48% and 1.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCSPX	SIDCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	1.52%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.21%	3.16%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.53%	4.29%	+0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.80%	6.42%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.23%	5.70%	+0.53%

FCSPX vs. SIDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SIDCX's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCSPX vs. SIDCX - Dividend Comparison

FCSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than SIDCX's 4.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCSPX Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port	4.83%	4.59%	3.95%	3.35%	3.28%	3.36%	3.51%	3.95%	4.88%	4.09%	4.30%	4.59%
SIDCX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund	4.71%	4.61%	4.20%	2.99%	2.36%	3.57%	4.93%	3.07%	3.16%	2.77%	2.75%	1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCSPX and SIDCX in my portfolio?

FCSPX and SIDCX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCSPX or SIDCX?

SIDCX has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to FCSPX (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSPX dropped -22.68% vs SIDCX's -21.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.