PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCSPX vs. DFTEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCSPX vs. DFTEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and DFA Intermediate-Term Extended Quality Portfolio Fund (DFTEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSPX achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than DFTEX's 0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FCSPX has outperformed DFTEX with an annualized return of 3.39%, while DFTEX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.39% annualized return.


FCSPX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.11%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.23%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
3.39%

DFTEX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.00%
YTD
0.97%
6M
0.78%
1Y
6.66%
3Y*
5.95%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
2.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSPX vs. DFTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCSPX
Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port
0.87%8.13%2.78%8.48%-16.25%-0.95%11.90%16.59%-3.05%8.03%
DFTEX
DFA Intermediate-Term Extended Quality Portfolio Fund
0.97%7.70%2.89%9.61%-16.28%-2.05%10.26%13.38%-2.10%5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSPX and DFTEX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between FCSPX and DFTEX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCSPX vs. DFTEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSPX
FCSPX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FCSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

DFTEX
DFTEX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DFTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DFTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSPX vs. DFTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and DFA Intermediate-Term Extended Quality Portfolio Fund (DFTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCSPXDFTEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.14

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.52

7.07

+0.45

FCSPX vs. DFTEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the DFTEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSPX and DFTEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCSPXDFTEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.64

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.13

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.41

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.48

+0.10

Drawdowns

FCSPX vs. DFTEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSPX drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, roughly equal to the maximum DFTEX drawdown of -22.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSPX and DFTEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCSPXDFTEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-22.83%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-3.22%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.14%

-5.38%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.68%

-22.83%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.68%

-22.83%

+0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.84%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-4.46%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.97%

-0.05%

Volatility

FCSPX vs. DFTEX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to DFA Intermediate-Term Extended Quality Portfolio Fund (DFTEX) at 1.39%. This indicates that FCSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFTEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCSPXDFTEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

1.39%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

3.08%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.52%

4.20%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.80%

6.71%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.23%

5.89%

+0.34%

FCSPX vs. DFTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DFTEX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCSPX vs. DFTEX - Dividend Comparison

FCSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, less than DFTEX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFTEX
DFA Intermediate-Term Extended Quality Portfolio Fund
4.93%4.30%4.27%3.79%3.25%4.12%3.31%3.06%3.24%2.91%2.88%3.90%
FCSPX
Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port
4.81%4.59%3.95%3.35%3.28%3.36%3.51%3.95%4.88%4.09%4.30%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCSPX and DFTEX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCSPX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to DFTEX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSPX dropped -22.68% vs DFTEX's -22.83%.

DFTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCSPX and DFTEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer