FCPVX vs. HRTVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) and Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX).
FCPVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. HRTVX is managed by Heartland. It was launched on Dec 28, 1984.
Performance
FCPVX vs. HRTVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCPVX vs. HRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund | 1.90% | 8.13% | 9.41% | 17.77% | -13.07% | 38.08% | 11.18% | 20.86% | -15.47% | 12.26% |
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund | 7.35% | 15.94% | 15.76% | 17.15% | -10.04% | 21.86% | 13.12% | 17.93% | -12.10% | 8.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCPVX achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than HRTVX's 7.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPVX has underperformed HRTVX with an annualized return of 9.75%, while HRTVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.03% annualized return.
FCPVX
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 3.51%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 6.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
HRTVX
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- 7.35%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 31.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCPVX vs. HRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCPVX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than HRTVX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCPVX vs. HRTVX — Risk / Return Rank
FCPVX
HRTVX
FCPVX vs. HRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) and Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCPVX | HRTVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.55 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 2.21 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.30 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 2.37 | -1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 9.02 | -4.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCPVX | HRTVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.55 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.52 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.53 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.58 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCPVX and HRTVX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCPVX vs. HRTVX - Dividend Comparison
FCPVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.96%, more than HRTVX's 8.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund | 9.96% | 10.15% | 6.13% | 5.20% | 5.92% | 7.95% | 0.46% | 3.49% | 36.44% | 3.64% | 7.12% | 11.09% |
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund | 8.65% | 9.29% | 8.91% | 5.65% | 3.01% | 13.50% | 0.76% | 3.12% | 7.26% | 6.43% | 3.56% | 8.25% |
Drawdowns
FCPVX vs. HRTVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCPVX drawdown since its inception was -57.65%, smaller than the maximum HRTVX drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPVX and HRTVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCPVX | HRTVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.65% | -61.68% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.40% | -13.48% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.81% | -23.17% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | -46.31% | +1.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.82% | -5.91% | -1.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -9.07% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 3.54% | +0.34% |
Volatility
FCPVX vs. HRTVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) and Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) have volatilities of 6.37% and 6.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCPVX | HRTVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 6.14% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 12.63% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.94% | 20.61% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 19.53% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 21.02% | +1.26% |