FCPI vs. PSCX
FCPI (Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FCPI is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCPI returned 15.12%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCPI charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
FCPI vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCPI achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.11% return.
FCPI
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 15.12%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 15.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
FCPI vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPI Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF | 11.23% | 16.24% | 25.54% | 15.40% | -7.11% | 34.19% | 1.01% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 5.11% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 16.57% | -7.35% | 9.03% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCPI and PSCX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FCPI and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
FCPI vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCPI
PSCX
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
FCPI
PSCX
Healthcare
FCPI
PSCX
Energy
FCPI
PSCX
Financial Services
FCPI
PSCX
Consumer Defensive
FCPI
PSCX
Consumer Cyclical
FCPI
PSCX
Basic Materials
FCPI
PSCX
Communication Services
FCPI
PSCX
Industrials
FCPI
PSCX
Real Estate
FCPI
PSCX
Utilities
FCPI
PSCX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCPI vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
FCPI
PSCX
FCPI vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCPI | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.58 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 3.70 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.56 | 18.94 | -7.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCPI | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.82 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 1.20 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.27 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
FCPI vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCPI drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPI and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCPI | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.26% | -10.20% | -27.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.88% | -4.20% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.44% | -9.61% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.25% | -10.20% | -8.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.12% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -1.87% | -2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 0.82% | +1.10% |
Volatility
FCPI vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 0.89%. This indicates that FCPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCPI | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 0.89% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 4.21% | +5.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 5.53% | +6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 7.07% | +9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 6.96% | +13.17% |
FCPI vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCPI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCPI vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
FCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPI Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF | 1.61% | 1.74% | 1.29% | 1.88% | 1.77% | 1.19% | 3.53% | 0.43% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCPI and PSCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCPI has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to PSCX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCPI dropped -37.26% vs PSCX's -10.20%.
On 5-year performance, FCPI leads with 15.12% vs 8.46% for PSCX. On fees, FCPI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FCPI has performed better with a 15.12% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCPI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
FCPI has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FCPI and 0.75% for PSCX.
PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCPI and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer