PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCPI vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCPI vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCPI achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.


FCPI

1D
-0.28%
1M
4.20%
YTD
11.23%
6M
10.30%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
21.82%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCPI vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCPI
Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF
11.23%16.24%25.54%15.40%-7.11%34.19%2.19%4.43%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%5.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FCPI and MTUM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.82

The correlation between FCPI and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCPI vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCPI
MTUM

Technology

28.3%
44.4%

Healthcare

13.3%
6.9%

Energy

12.3%
3.5%

Financial Services

7.5%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
3.6%

Basic Materials

6.5%
1.7%

Communication Services

5.6%
7.4%

Industrials

5.6%
15.6%

Real Estate

4.5%
1.8%

Utilities

2.4%
1.6%

Technology

FCPI
28.3%
MTUM
44.4%

Healthcare

FCPI
13.3%
MTUM
6.9%

Energy

FCPI
12.3%
MTUM
3.5%

Financial Services

FCPI
7.5%
MTUM
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

FCPI
7.2%
MTUM
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FCPI
6.9%
MTUM
3.6%

Basic Materials

FCPI
6.5%
MTUM
1.7%

Communication Services

FCPI
5.6%
MTUM
7.4%

Industrials

FCPI
5.6%
MTUM
15.6%

Real Estate

FCPI
4.5%
MTUM
1.8%

Utilities

FCPI
2.4%
MTUM
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCPI vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCPI
FCPI Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FCPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCPI vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCPIMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.64

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.56

14.50

-2.94

FCPI vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCPI and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCPIMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.20

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.74

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.85

-0.10

Drawdowns

FCPI vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCPI drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPI and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCPIMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-34.08%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.88%

-11.54%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.44%

-20.99%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.25%

-32.28%

+14.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-6.21%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.89%

-0.97%

Volatility

FCPI vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI) is 3.75%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that FCPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCPIMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

7.68%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

16.46%

-7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

19.04%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

20.60%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

21.03%

-0.90%

FCPI vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCPI and MTUM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCPI vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

FCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPI
Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF
1.61%1.74%1.29%1.88%1.77%1.19%3.53%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCPI and MTUM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to FCPI (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCPI dropped -37.26% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.21% vs 15.12% for FCPI. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, FCPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 15.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCPI and MTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

FCPI has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

FCPI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. FCPI tracks Fidelity Stocks for Inflation Factor Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCPI and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer