FCPI vs. BUFH
FCPI (Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCPI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Stocks for Inflation Factor Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Over the past year, FCPI returned 18.58% vs 6.20% for BUFH. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCPI charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
FCPI vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCPI achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.30% return.
FCPI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 14.29%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCPI vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FCPI Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF | 9.21% | 8.58% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.30% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCPI and BUFH is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCPI vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
FCPI
BUFH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCPI vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCPI | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCPI vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCPI drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPI and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCPI | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.26% | -1.53% | -35.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.88% | -1.53% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -0.26% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -0.18% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | — | — |
Volatility
FCPI vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCPI | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.42% | 2.38% | +10.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 2.38% | +14.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.11% | 2.38% | +17.73% |
FCPI vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCPI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCPI vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
FCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCPI Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF | 1.63% | 1.74% | 1.29% | 1.88% | 1.77% | 1.19% | 3.53% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCPI and BUFH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, FCPI leads with 18.58% vs 6.20% for BUFH. On fees, FCPI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FCPI has performed better with a 18.58% return vs 6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCPI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
FCPI has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
FCPI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FCPI and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for FCPI and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer